[Bug fortran/50094] New: [4.7 Regression] FAIL: gfortran.dg/coarray_6.f90

[Bug fortran/50094] New: [4.7 Regression] FAIL: gfortran.dg/coarray_6.f90

[hjl.tools at gmail dot com]

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50094

             Bug #: 50094
           Summary: [4.7 Regression] FAIL: gfortran.dg/coarray_6.f90
    Classification: Unclassified
           Product: gcc
           Version: 4.7.0
            Status: UNCONFIRMED
          Severity: normal
          Priority: P3
         Component: fortran
        AssignedTo: unassigned@gcc.gnu.org
        ReportedBy: hjl.tools@gmail.com
                CC: burnus@gcc.gnu.org


On Linux/ia32, revision 177770  gave

FAIL: gfortran.dg/coarray_26.f90  -O   (test for errors, line 17)
FAIL: gfortran.dg/coarray_26.f90  -O   (test for errors, line 25)
FAIL: gfortran.dg/coarray_26.f90  -O   (test for errors, line 31)
FAIL: gfortran.dg/coarray_26.f90  -O   (test for errors, line 36)
FAIL: gfortran.dg/coarray_26.f90  -O  (test for excess errors)
FAIL: gfortran.dg/coarray_6.f90  -O   (test for errors, line 50)
FAIL: gfortran.dg/coarray_6.f90  -O  (test for excess errors)

Revision 177764 is OK.

[Bug fortran/50094] [4.7 Regression] FAIL: gfortran.dg/coarray_6.f90

[dominiq at lps dot ens.fr]

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50094

--- Comment #1 from Dominique d'Humieres <dominiq at lps dot ens.fr> 2011-08-15 22:27:25 UTC ---
I have not reached this stage yet, but I see the following typo (shallolvnot):

gcc/fortran/resolve.c:      gfc_error ("Function result '%s' at %L shallolvnot
be a coarray or have "

[Bug fortran/50094] [4.7 Regression] FAIL: gfortran.dg/coarray_6.f90

[dominiq at lps dot ens.fr]

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50094

Dominique d'Humieres <dominiq at lps dot ens.fr> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|UNCONFIRMED                 |NEW
   Last reconfirmed|                            |2011-08-15
     Ever Confirmed|0                           |1

--- Comment #2 from Dominique d'Humieres <dominiq at lps dot ens.fr> 2011-08-15 22:59:55 UTC ---
I confirm the failures and that fixing the typo in gcc/fortran/resolve.c make
them disappear.

[Bug fortran/50094] [4.7 Regression] FAIL: gfortran.dg/coarray_6.f90

[burnus at gcc dot gnu.org]

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50094

Tobias Burnus <burnus at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|NEW                         |ASSIGNED

--- Comment #3 from Tobias Burnus <burnus at gcc dot gnu.org> 2011-08-16 06:56:23 UTC ---
I really wonder how this typo in the patch for PR 50094 ended up in my patch
file ...

[Bug fortran/50094] [4.7 Regression] FAIL: gfortran.dg/coarray_6.f90

[rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org]

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50094

Richard Guenther <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
   Target Milestone|---                         |4.7.0

[Bug fortran/50094] [4.7 Regression] FAIL: gfortran.dg/coarray_6.f90

[hp at gcc dot gnu.org]

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50094

--- Comment #4 from Hans-Peter Nilsson <hp at gcc dot gnu.org> 2011-08-16 20:07:56 UTC ---
Is this PR more than a trivial typo?

Hm, so this PR is in the assigned state but not yet assigned to anyone?
What's up with that?

[Bug fortran/50094] [4.7 Regression] FAIL: gfortran.dg/coarray_6.f90

[burnus at gcc dot gnu.org]

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50094

--- Comment #5 from Tobias Burnus <burnus at gcc dot gnu.org> 2011-08-16 21:26:26 UTC ---
Author: burnus
Date: Tue Aug 16 21:26:23 2011
New Revision: 177801

URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=177801
Log:
2011-08-16  Tobias Burnus  <burnus@net-b.de>
            Dominique Dhumieres  <dominiq@lps.ens.fr>

        PR fortran/50094
        * resolve.c (resolve_symbol): Fix stupid typo.


Modified:
    trunk/gcc/fortran/ChangeLog
    trunk/gcc/fortran/resolve.c

[Bug fortran/50094] [4.7 Regression] FAIL: gfortran.dg/coarray_6.f90

[burnus at gcc dot gnu.org]

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50094

Tobias Burnus <burnus at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|ASSIGNED                    |RESOLVED
         Resolution|                            |FIXED

--- Comment #6 from Tobias Burnus <burnus at gcc dot gnu.org> 2011-08-16 21:34:39 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #5)
> New Revision: 177801
> URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=177801

Mark as FIXED. Thanks for the report HJ and for the debugging Dominique! Sorry
for the breakage - and for the delay as I don't have a checked-out GCC tree at
work.


(In reply to comment #4)
> Is this PR more than a trivial typo?

No. It was just the typo mentioned in comment 2, which somehow crept in.


> Hm, so this PR is in the assigned state but not yet assigned to anyone?
> What's up with that?

That's a useability bug of Bugzilla 3 and 4. Before, one could simply mark the
bug as assigned to oneself (combobox + checkbox). Now with BZ3 (and with the
just installed 4.0.2), one has to use "Status: ASSIGNED" and then one needs to
move to the top of the page, click on "(edit)" in the "Assigned To" line and
change the email address, which I forgot when trying to assign the bug to me.