From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 30300 invoked by alias); 10 Jan 2012 08:46:20 -0000 Received: (qmail 30287 invoked by uid 22791); 10 Jan 2012 08:46:18 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.8 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,AWL,BAYES_00,TW_XL X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from localhost (HELO gcc.gnu.org) (127.0.0.1) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Tue, 10 Jan 2012 08:46:06 +0000 From: "burnus at gcc dot gnu.org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug libfortran/50105] [4.6/4.7 Regression] I/O with g6.5 - wrong number of "**" shown Date: Tue, 10 Jan 2012 08:46:00 -0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: libfortran X-Bugzilla-Keywords: wrong-code X-Bugzilla-Severity: minor X-Bugzilla-Who: burnus at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Status: UNCONFIRMED X-Bugzilla-Priority: P5 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 4.6.3 X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org X-SW-Source: 2012-01/txt/msg00971.txt.bz2 http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50105 --- Comment #13 from Tobias Burnus 2012-01-10 08:45:21 UTC --- (In reply to comment #12) > Did any interpretation requests go in on this and did we get an answer back? No, but I just wrote one: http://j3-fortran.org/pipermail/j3/2012-January/004976.html The next J3 meeting will be #197, February 13-17, 2012, Las Vegas NV USA The IR should pop up soon at: http://j3-fortran.org/doc/meeting/197/ > I am leaning toward current 4.7 is OK and 4.6 has the regression. Sorry, that twists my mind. 4.6.0 *and* 4.7 produce "******". (While g77 and GCC 4.1 to 4.5 produce "** ".) Any reason - in terms of the standard - why you "am leaning toward current 4.7"? I believe that Bob Corbett and Malcolm Cohen are right and "** " is the correct output - even if more compilers have six asterisks: "** ": g77, gfortran < 4.6, g95, NAG f95, PGI "******": gfortran >= 4.6.0, ifort, crayftn, open64, pathf95, Sun/Oracle f95, IBM xlf