From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 15664 invoked by alias); 6 Jan 2012 13:01:37 -0000 Received: (qmail 15653 invoked by uid 22791); 6 Jan 2012 13:01:35 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.9 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,AWL,BAYES_00 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from localhost (HELO gcc.gnu.org) (127.0.0.1) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Fri, 06 Jan 2012 13:01:23 +0000 From: "jakub at gcc dot gnu.org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug gcov-profile/50127] [4.7 regression] g++.dg/tree-prof/partition2.C FAILs on several targets Date: Fri, 06 Jan 2012 13:01:00 -0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: gcov-profile X-Bugzilla-Keywords: assemble-failure X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: jakub at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Status: ASSIGNED X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: jakub at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 4.7.0 X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Status AssignedTo Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org X-SW-Source: 2012-01/txt/msg00636.txt.bz2 http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50127 Jakub Jelinek changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|REOPENED |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot |jakub at gcc dot gnu.org |gnu.org | --- Comment #8 from Jakub Jelinek 2012-01-06 13:00:28 UTC --- Created attachment 26256 --> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=26256 gcc47-pr50127.patch Untested fix. The problem was that partition_hot_cold_basic_blocks was leaving garbage in some bb->aux fields, but subsequent optimization passes and/or df_analyze here assume that each pass cleans that up after itself. DF was storing age in bb->aux as ptrdiff_t values, and when some bb->aux contained pointer to another bb, if it was in the upper half of address space (for 32-bit hosts), it was treated as negative age, while if in the lower half of AS (for 64-bit hosts), it was just assumed to be very huge age.