[Bug bootstrap/50156] New: in-tree CLooG is not picked up by toplevel configure

[Bug bootstrap/50156] New: in-tree CLooG is not picked up by toplevel configure

[vanboxem.ruben at gmail dot com]

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50156

             Bug #: 50156
           Summary: in-tree CLooG is not picked up by toplevel configure
    Classification: Unclassified
           Product: gcc
           Version: 4.7.0
            Status: UNCONFIRMED
          Severity: normal
          Priority: P3
         Component: bootstrap
        AssignedTo: unassigned@gcc.gnu.org
        ReportedBy: vanboxem.ruben@gmail.com


Created attachment 25078
  --> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=25078
gcc/config.log

With the patches attached to 

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50139

I can successfully build GCC with in-tree GMP/MPFR/MPC/PPL/CLOOG for

--host=x86_64-linux-gnu --target=*-w64-mingw32 --build=x86_64-linux-gnu
--host=*-w64-mingw32 --target=*-w64-mingw32 --build=x86_64-linux-gnu

I can see in the build logs all libs are built in tree, but when linking the
cc1 executable, the cloog libs are missing. Searching for the "no-graphite"
error message ("sorry, unimplemented...") I found that HAVE_cloog is not
properly defined, which is a symptom of clooglibs not being properly filled in
in gcc/configure

Attached is gcc/config.log

[Bug bootstrap/50156] in-tree CLooG is not picked up by toplevel configure

[vanboxem.ruben at gmail dot com]

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50156

--- Comment #1 from Ruben Van Boxem <vanboxem.ruben at gmail dot com> 2011-08-22 19:07:38 UTC ---
Created attachment 25079
  --> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=25079
"make all-gcc" log where -lcloog and friends are missing for cc1

Attached build log

[Bug bootstrap/50156] in-tree CLooG is not picked up by toplevel configure

[vanboxem.ruben at gmail dot com]

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50156

--- Comment #2 from Ruben Van Boxem <vanboxem.ruben at gmail dot com> 2011-08-24 19:26:55 UTC ---
Created attachment 25090
  --> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=25090
Patch to allow a non-bootstrap compiler to build with in tree prereqs for
graphite

Attached is a full patch (including manual changes to generated files) that
allow for in-tree CLooG (isl) to be used to build a GCC with Graphite.

This patch was made against GCC 4.6 (SVN) and should apply cleanly for testing
purposes.

I have not "ported" the configure bit for CLooG to configure.ac, the rest (in
configure and makefile.in) should be matched by makefile.def and configure.ac
changes.

[Bug bootstrap/50156] in-tree CLooG is not picked up by toplevel configure

[vanboxem.ruben at gmail dot com]

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50156

Ruben Van Boxem <vanboxem.ruben at gmail dot com> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
  Attachment #25090|0                           |1
        is obsolete|                            |

--- Comment #3 from Ruben Van Boxem <vanboxem.ruben at gmail dot com> 2011-08-24 20:15:20 UTC ---
Created attachment 25093
  --> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=25093
Patch to allow a non-bootstrap compiler to build with in tree prereqs for
graphite

Corrected small issues with ppl-watchdog (enabled it regardless for an intree
build; this would break an out-of tree ppl without libpwl though: it's hacky)

The problem is that in-tree ppl should be configured with --disable-watchdog if
$enable_watchdog is not requested.

[Bug bootstrap/50156] in-tree CLooG is not picked up by toplevel configure

[manu at gcc dot gnu.org]

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50156
Bug 50156 depends on bug 50139, which changed state.

Bug 50139 Summary: in-tree GMP/PPL/CLooG is misconfigured
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50139

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|UNCONFIRMED                 |RESOLVED
         Resolution|---                         |WONTFIX

[Bug bootstrap/50156] in-tree CLooG is not picked up by toplevel configure

[manu at gcc dot gnu.org]

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50156

Manuel López-Ibáñez <manu at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|UNCONFIRMED                 |RESOLVED
                 CC|                            |manu at gcc dot gnu.org
         Resolution|---                         |WONTFIX

--- Comment #4 from Manuel López-Ibáñez <manu at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
CLooG will be removed in GCC 5.0. If you still think these patches are useful
for trunk please re-open the bug.

Patches in bugzilla tend to get lost, it is better to send them to gcc-patches@
and ping, ping, ping, ping... until you get someone to review them.
>From gcc-bugs-return-471927-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Tue Dec 30 12:53:45 2014
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-471927-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 10939 invoked by alias); 30 Dec 2014 12:53:45 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 10883 invoked by uid 48); 30 Dec 2014 12:53:31 -0000
From: "belagod at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug libstdc++/64443] New: New std::string implementation breaks tests on AArch64.
Date: Tue, 30 Dec 2014 12:53:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: new
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: libstdc++
X-Bugzilla-Version: 5.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords:
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: belagod at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: UNCONFIRMED
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags:
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: bug_id short_desc product version bug_status bug_severity priority component assigned_to reporter
Message-ID: <bug-64443-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SW-Source: 2014-12/txt/msg02934.txt.bz2
Content-length: 3422

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?idd443

            Bug ID: 64443
           Summary: New std::string implementation breaks tests on
                    AArch64.
           Product: gcc
           Version: 5.0
            Status: UNCONFIRMED
          Severity: normal
          Priority: P3
         Component: libstdc++
          Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
          Reporter: belagod at gcc dot gnu.org

This commit seems to be breaking libstdc++-v3 runs on AArch64.

Author: redi <redi@138bc75d-0d04-0410-961f-82ee72b054a4>
Date:   Fri Dec 19 18:16:39 2014 +0000

    New std::string implementation.

        * acinclude.m4 (GLIBCXX_ENABLE_LIBSTDCXX_CXX11_ABI): Remove.
        (GLIBCXX_ENABLE_LIBSTDCXX_DUAL_ABI, GLIBCXX_DEFAULT_ABI): Add.
        * configure.ac: Use new macros.
        * configure: Regenerate.
        * Makefile.in: Regenerate.
        * doc/Makefile.in: Regenerate.
        * libsupc++/Makefile.in: Regenerate.
        * po/Makefile.in: Regenerate.
        * src/Makefile.in: Regenerate.
        * testsuite/Makefile.in: Regenerate.
        * include/Makefile.am: Set _GLIBCXX_USE_DUAL_ABI.
        * include/Makefile.in: Regenerate.
        * config/abi/pre/gnu.ver: Export symbols related to new std::string.
        Tighten old patterns to not match new symbols.
        * config/locale/generic/monetary_members.cc: Guard some definitions
        to not compile with new ABI.
        * config/locale/gnu/monetary_members.cc: Likewise.
        * config/locale/gnu/numeric_members.cc: Prevent double-free.
    ....


PASS->FAIL: 22_locale/locale/cons/6.cc execution test
PASS->FAIL: 22_locale/num_get/get/char/11.cc execution test
PASS->FAIL: 22_locale/num_get/get/char/12.cc execution test
PASS->FAIL: 22_locale/num_get/get/char/13.cc execution test
PASS->FAIL: 22_locale/num_get/get/char/14.cc execution test
PASS->FAIL: 22_locale/num_get/get/char/15.cc execution test
PASS->FAIL: 22_locale/num_get/get/char/22131.cc execution test
PASS->FAIL: 22_locale/num_get/get/char/23953.cc execution test
PASS->FAIL: 22_locale/num_get/get/char/37958.cc execution test
PASS->FAIL: 22_locale/num_get/get/char/39168.cc execution test
PASS->FAIL: 22_locale/num_get/get/wchar_t/11.cc execution test
PASS->FAIL: 22_locale/num_get/get/wchar_t/12.cc execution test
PASS->FAIL: 22_locale/num_get/get/wchar_t/13.cc execution test
PASS->FAIL: 22_locale/num_get/get/wchar_t/14.cc execution test
PASS->FAIL: 22_locale/num_get/get/wchar_t/15.cc execution test
PASS->FAIL: 22_locale/num_get/get/wchar_t/22131.cc execution test
PASS->FAIL: 22_locale/num_get/get/wchar_t/23953.cc execution test
PASS->FAIL: 22_locale/num_get/get/wchar_t/37958.cc execution test
PASS->FAIL: 22_locale/num_get/get/wchar_t/39168.cc execution test
PASS->FAIL: 22_locale/num_put/put/char/11.cc execution test
PASS->FAIL: 22_locale/num_put/put/char/23953.cc execution test
PASS->FAIL: 22_locale/num_put/put/char/38196.cc execution test
PASS->FAIL: 22_locale/num_put/put/wchar_t/11.cc execution test
PASS->FAIL: 22_locale/num_put/put/wchar_t/23953.cc execution test
PASS->FAIL: 22_locale/num_put/put/wchar_t/38196.cc execution test
PASS->FAIL: 22_locale/numpunct/members/char/cache_1.cc execution test
PASS->FAIL: 22_locale/numpunct/members/char/cache_2.cc execution test
PASS->FAIL: 22_locale/numpunct/members/wchar_t/cache_1.cc execution test
PASS->FAIL: 22_locale/numpunct/members/wchar_t/cache_2.cc execution test