public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "jakub at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug libgomp/50175] data race with OMP barrier
Date: Wed, 24 Aug 2011 15:02:00 -0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <bug-50175-4-9gr9bHsbIF@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <bug-50175-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50175

Jakub Jelinek <jakub at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |jakub at gcc dot gnu.org,
                   |                            |rth at gcc dot gnu.org

--- Comment #1 from Jakub Jelinek <jakub at gcc dot gnu.org> 2011-08-24 14:55:18 UTC ---
If this is about bar->arrived writes, then I don't see any races.
During the lifetime of a barrier, in the first phase arrived is incremented by
each thread, guarded by bar->mutex1 lock.  The threads then unlock bar->mutex1
lock, except for the last thread which keeps it locked and decrements
bar->arrived again, then, still with bar->mutex1 locked wakes up all the other
threads which then either atomically, or guarded with bar->mutex2 lock,
decrement bar->arrived again.  The last of those threads then posts to
bar->sem2
semaphore on which the thread holding bar->mutex1 is waiting before unlocking
that lock.  Thus, I don't see how the first phase (where bar->arrived
adjustments are done guarded with bar->mutex1 lock) can overlap with the second
phase (where it is decremented atomically or with mutex2).  Not even the second
phase with following first phase.  Thus I think valgrind is wrong about this.

CCing rth as author...


  reply	other threads:[~2011-08-24 14:56 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2011-08-24 14:16 [Bug libgomp/50175] New: data race with barrier Joost.VandeVondele at pci dot uzh.ch
2011-08-24 15:02 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org [this message]
2013-03-29  9:11 ` [Bug libgomp/50175] data race with OMP barrier Joost.VandeVondele at mat dot ethz.ch

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=bug-50175-4-9gr9bHsbIF@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ \
    --to=gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org \
    --cc=gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).