From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-412057-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: (qmail 6012 invoked by alias); 14 Jan 2013 14:46:26 -0000
Received: (qmail 4897 invoked by uid 55); 14 Jan 2013 14:45:51 -0000
From: "rguenther at suse dot de" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug middle-end/50199] [4.7/4.8 Regression] wrong code with -flto -fno-merge-constants
Date: Mon, 14 Jan 2013 14:46:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: middle-end
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: lto, wrong-code
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: rguenther at suse dot de
X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P2
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 4.8.0
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields:
Message-ID: <bug-50199-4-nNPgf9PtHA@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-50199-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-50199-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
X-SW-Source: 2013-01/txt/msg01176.txt.bz2


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50199

--- Comment #14 from rguenther at suse dot de <rguenther at suse dot de> 2013-01-14 14:45:48 UTC ---
On 1/11/13 5:02 PM, jakub at gcc dot gnu.org wrote:
> 
> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50199
> 
> Jakub Jelinek <jakub at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
> 
>            What    |Removed                     |Added
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
>                  CC|                            |jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
> 
> --- Comment #13 from Jakub Jelinek <jakub at gcc dot gnu.org> 2013-01-11 16:02:24 UTC ---
> I guess it is again too late to really fix this for 4.8, can we at least error
> out on -fno-merge-constants used together with -flto ?  We'll still fail for
> targets that don't support mergeable string sections, but generally, it makes
> no sense to use -fno-merge-constants together with -flto.

We could, I suppose.  I'm not sure this isn't an issue without LTO
though (possibly way harder to trigger though).