public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug tree-optimization/50204] [4.5/4.6/4.7 Regression] Missed fully redundant load found in crafty (SPEC 2k)
Date: Mon, 29 Aug 2011 07:02:00 -0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <bug-50204-4-Rx3wYJ9q3h@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <bug-50204-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50204

--- Comment #2 from Andrew Pinski <pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org> 2011-08-29 03:00:48 UTC ---
Created attachment 25124
  --> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=25124
Patch which was tested on x86_64 without any regressions

Note I am going to add this patch here as the copyright assignment for Cavium
is not completed yet (though it is in the process of clearing up).  This
implements what is mentioned in comment #1 and was tested on x86_64-linux-gnu
with no regressions.  I don't know what the compile time slow down that happens
yet and have not added any testcases but it works on the testcase attached to
the bug.  I also have not checked what the performance increase on SPEC would
be.


  parent reply	other threads:[~2011-08-29  3:01 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2011-08-26 22:07 [Bug tree-optimization/50204] New: " pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
2011-08-26 22:17 ` [Bug tree-optimization/50204] " pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
2011-08-27  8:19 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2011-08-29  7:02 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org [this message]
2011-08-29  7:39 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2011-08-29  8:05 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2011-10-10 12:30 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2011-10-10 19:59 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
2011-10-10 20:49 ` rguenther at suse dot de
2011-10-10 20:51 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
2011-10-11  9:02 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2011-10-11 11:58 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2011-10-11 11:58 ` [Bug tree-optimization/50204] [4.5/4.6 " rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=bug-50204-4-Rx3wYJ9q3h@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ \
    --to=gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org \
    --cc=gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body. 
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).