public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "ro at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug bootstrap/50237] [4.7 regression] bootstrap comparison failure for libcpp/lex.o
Date: Tue, 04 Oct 2011 13:57:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <bug-50237-4-Z4caJ9wmpK@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <bug-50237-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50237
Rainer Orth <ro at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Target|x86_64-suse-linux |x86_64-suse-linux,
| |*-*-solaris2*
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed| |2011-10-04
CC| |ro at gcc dot gnu.org
Host|x86_64-suse-linux |x86_64-suse-linux,
| |*-*-solaris2*
Ever Confirmed|0 |1
Build|x86_64-suse-linux |x86_64-suse-linux,
| |*-*-solaris2*
--- Comment #19 from Rainer Orth <ro at gcc dot gnu.org> 2011-10-04 13:54:59 UTC ---
I observe exactly the same problem on Solaris 11/x86, especially with Go:
gcc/go/unsafe.o differs
gcc/go/lex.o differs
gcc/go/runtime.o differs
gcc/go/expressions.o differs
gcc/go/dataflow.o differs
gcc/go/ast-dump.o differs
gcc/go/go-gcc.o differs
gcc/go/import.o differs
gcc/go/go.o differs
gcc/go/export.o differs
gcc/go/go-optimize.o differs
gcc/go/go-dump.o differs
gcc/go/import-archive.o differs
gcc/go/gogo.o differs
gcc/go/statements.o differs
gcc/go/gogo-tree.o differs
gcc/go/types.o differs
gcc/go/parse.o differs
The bootstrap compiler is gcc 4.4.2 configured with gas 2.19 and Sun ld, while
I'm configuring with gas and gld 2.21.90 which have full
.init_array/.fini_array
support as required by H.J.'s check.
Initially, I tried make bootstrap4, assuming that the comparison of stage2 and
stage3 would be skipped in favour of the stage3/stage4 comparison (which works
ok), but unfortunately this is not the case.
Rainer
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-10-04 13:57 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 48+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-08-30 13:26 [Bug bootstrap/50237] New: [4.7 regression] comparison failure caused by HAVE_INITFINI_ARRAY check ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org
2011-08-30 13:41 ` [Bug bootstrap/50237] " rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2011-08-30 13:50 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2011-08-30 13:51 ` hjl.tools at gmail dot com
2011-08-30 13:58 ` ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org
2011-08-30 14:07 ` hjl.tools at gmail dot com
2011-08-30 14:23 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2011-08-30 14:34 ` hjl.tools at gmail dot com
2011-08-30 15:30 ` ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org
2011-08-30 15:57 ` joseph at codesourcery dot com
2011-08-30 16:30 ` hjl.tools at gmail dot com
2011-08-30 16:36 ` hjl.tools at gmail dot com
2011-08-30 16:57 ` joseph at codesourcery dot com
2011-08-31 7:04 ` hjl.tools at gmail dot com
2011-08-31 15:46 ` joseph at codesourcery dot com
2011-08-31 15:47 ` hjl.tools at gmail dot com
2011-08-31 16:20 ` joseph at codesourcery dot com
2011-09-02 18:10 ` hjl.tools at gmail dot com
2011-09-03 9:32 ` [Bug bootstrap/50237] [4.7 regression] bootstrap comparison failure for libcpp/lex.o ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org
2011-09-03 17:17 ` hjl.tools at gmail dot com
2011-09-10 15:03 ` hjl.tools at gmail dot com
2011-10-04 13:57 ` ro at gcc dot gnu.org [this message]
2011-11-22 17:59 ` ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE
2011-11-22 18:03 ` hjl.tools at gmail dot com
2011-11-22 18:21 ` ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE
2011-11-22 18:35 ` hjl.tools at gmail dot com
2011-11-23 16:30 ` ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE
2011-11-23 16:52 ` hjl.tools at gmail dot com
2011-11-23 17:17 ` ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE
2011-11-23 17:20 ` hjl.tools at gmail dot com
2011-11-24 18:07 ` ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE
2011-11-28 15:20 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
2011-11-28 16:03 ` ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE
2011-12-01 20:26 ` ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org
2011-12-07 22:06 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
2012-01-09 0:54 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
2012-01-09 14:31 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2012-01-17 16:06 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
2012-01-19 10:49 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
2012-01-19 10:55 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
2012-01-19 16:26 ` ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE
2012-01-19 16:32 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
2012-01-19 16:41 ` ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE
2012-01-19 16:51 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
2012-01-19 16:54 ` ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE
2012-01-20 0:25 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
2012-02-22 22:10 ` jingyu at gcc dot gnu.org
2012-02-22 22:31 ` jingyu at gcc dot gnu.org
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=bug-50237-4-Z4caJ9wmpK@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ \
--to=gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org \
--cc=gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).