From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 944 invoked by alias); 3 Sep 2011 18:21:16 -0000 Received: (qmail 934 invoked by uid 22791); 3 Sep 2011 18:21:16 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.9 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,AWL,BAYES_00 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from localhost (HELO gcc.gnu.org) (127.0.0.1) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Sat, 03 Sep 2011 18:21:02 +0000 From: "danglin at gcc dot gnu.org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug other/50283] [4.7 Regression] FAIL: g++.dg/eh/simd-1.C execution test Date: Sat, 03 Sep 2011 18:21:00 -0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: other X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: danglin at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Status: UNCONFIRMED X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: --- X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org X-SW-Source: 2011-09/txt/msg00228.txt.bz2 http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50283 --- Comment #1 from John David Anglin 2011-09-03 18:20:58 UTC --- (In reply to comment #0) > Thought at first that this might be caused by stack allocation instruction > being placed in call delay slot, but fail also occurs at -O0. This is wrong. The test doesn't fail at -O0 (I ran the wrong executable). At -O, the CFI labels appear incorrectly placed