From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 22584 invoked by alias); 10 Jan 2012 11:32:39 -0000 Received: (qmail 22573 invoked by uid 22791); 10 Jan 2012 11:32:38 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.9 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,AWL,BAYES_00 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from localhost (HELO gcc.gnu.org) (127.0.0.1) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Tue, 10 Jan 2012 11:32:26 +0000 From: "vries at gcc dot gnu.org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug middle-end/50283] [4.7 Regression] FAIL: g++.dg/eh/simd-1.C execution test Date: Tue, 10 Jan 2012 11:32:00 -0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: middle-end X-Bugzilla-Keywords: EH X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: vries at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Status: RESOLVED X-Bugzilla-Priority: P1 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 4.7.0 X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: CC Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org X-SW-Source: 2012-01/txt/msg00994.txt.bz2 http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50283 vries at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |vries at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #15 from vries at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-01-10 11:31:55 UTC --- (In reply to comment #9) > You don't. We're supposed to prevent frame-related insns > from appearing in branch delay slots. Richard, do you mean this in general, or just for calls? Either way, we should be able to formulate an assert in scan_trace that checks this condition. Do you think that would be useful? Thanks, - Tom