From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-367139-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: (qmail 22267 invoked by alias); 5 Sep 2011 12:50:23 -0000
Received: (qmail 22236 invoked by uid 22791); 5 Sep 2011 12:50:20 -0000
X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.9 required=5.0	tests=ALL_TRUSTED,AWL,BAYES_00
X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org
Received: from localhost (HELO gcc.gnu.org) (127.0.0.1)    by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Mon, 05 Sep 2011 12:50:07 +0000
From: "janus at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug fortran/50288] FAIL: gfortran.dg/class_45b.f03
Date: Mon, 05 Sep 2011 12:50:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: fortran
X-Bugzilla-Keywords:
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: janus at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: ASSIGNED
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: janus at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Status AssignedTo
Message-ID: <bug-50288-4-CTZgYUFGSw@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-50288-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-50288-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
X-SW-Source: 2011-09/txt/msg00316.txt.bz2

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50288

janus at gcc dot gnu.org changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|NEW                         |ASSIGNED
         AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot       |janus at gcc dot gnu.org
                   |gnu.org                     |

--- Comment #8 from janus at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-09-05 12:49:35 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #7)
> (In reply to comment #6)
> > That sounds reasonable (much better than the evil "double blank" trick). Ok
> > with me.
> 
> Can you package it? (This patch, modification to class_45b.f03 w/ comment, and
> to cray_pointers_2.f90.) As test-suite patch, it probably should probably be
> rubber stamped by a test-suite maintained such as Rainer Orth.

Sure, I'll take care of it. Thanks for your help in fixing this so quickly.