public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug middle-end/50325] [4.7 Regression] 76 new fails with rev. 177691
Date: Thu, 08 Sep 2011 12:10:00 -0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <bug-50325-4-vjoaa4LKet@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <bug-50325-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50325

Richard Guenther <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
             Blocks|                            |50137
   Target Milestone|---                         |4.7.0
            Summary|76 new fails with rev.      |[4.7 Regression] 76 new
                   |177691                      |fails with rev. 177691

--- Comment #2 from Richard Guenther <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> 2011-09-08 11:58:54 UTC ---
Supposedly the MEMs get a mode but the alignment isn't that of the mode?
OTOH this is an array of chars:

          array_type = build_array_type (char_type_node,
                                         build_index_type
                                           (size_binop (MINUS_EXPR,
                                                        arg2, size_int (1))));

we should never layout this in a way that array_type gets anything but
BLKmode (well, maybe QImode for size 1).

That said, it really needs some more investigation.  Possible causes must
be similar to those that made us change memcpy -> MEM_REF folding in
fold_builtin_memory_op so many times for STRICT_ALIGNMENT targets.


  parent reply	other threads:[~2011-09-08 11:59 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 43+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2011-09-08 10:32 [Bug middle-end/50325] New: " krebbel at gcc dot gnu.org
2011-09-08 10:51 ` [Bug middle-end/50325] " dominiq at lps dot ens.fr
2011-09-08 12:10 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org [this message]
2011-09-08 12:35 ` [Bug middle-end/50325] [4.7 Regression] " rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2011-09-14  7:38 ` krebbel at gcc dot gnu.org
2011-09-14  8:50 ` krebbel at gcc dot gnu.org
2011-09-14 13:33 ` dominiq at lps dot ens.fr
2011-09-14 18:04 ` dominiq at lps dot ens.fr
2011-09-14 18:29 ` dominiq at lps dot ens.fr
2011-09-16 14:46 ` dominiq at lps dot ens.fr
2011-10-10 12:36 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2011-11-16  9:50 ` krebbel at gcc dot gnu.org
2011-11-16 10:22 ` krebbel at gcc dot gnu.org
2011-11-17 15:19 ` dje at gcc dot gnu.org
2011-11-17 15:21 ` dje at gcc dot gnu.org
2011-11-17 15:53 ` krebbel at gcc dot gnu.org
2011-11-17 16:38 ` dominiq at lps dot ens.fr
2011-11-19 16:08 ` iains at gcc dot gnu.org
2011-11-19 19:29 ` ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org
2011-11-20 12:32 ` rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org
2011-11-21  0:55 ` oleg.endo@t-online.de
2011-11-21  8:42 ` iains at gcc dot gnu.org
2011-11-21 22:03 ` davem at gcc dot gnu.org
2011-11-22  9:49 ` krebbel at gcc dot gnu.org
2011-12-01  9:22 ` rguenther at suse dot de
2011-12-01 10:11 ` iains at gcc dot gnu.org
2011-12-01 10:26 ` iains at gcc dot gnu.org
2011-12-01 11:08 ` iains at gcc dot gnu.org
2011-12-01 11:26 ` rguenther at suse dot de
2012-01-08 13:00 ` dominiq at lps dot ens.fr
2012-01-08 17:26 ` ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org
2012-01-15 13:40 ` dominiq at lps dot ens.fr
2012-01-16 17:06 ` dje at gcc dot gnu.org
2012-01-16 21:32 ` rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org
2012-01-16 22:05 ` ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org
2012-01-16 22:21 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
2012-01-16 23:06 ` ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org
2012-01-17 11:36 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
2012-01-17 12:09 ` rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org
2012-01-17 22:10 ` rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org
2012-01-17 23:46 ` rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org
2012-01-23 10:12 ` amodra at gmail dot com
2020-03-13  9:10 ` marxin at gcc dot gnu.org

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=bug-50325-4-vjoaa4LKet@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ \
    --to=gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org \
    --cc=gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).