From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48) id F3ED73858C55; Fri, 29 Mar 2024 17:50:33 +0000 (GMT) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org F3ED73858C55 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org; s=default; t=1711734634; bh=xVMTYmYrwVngc8FKd2urhBlFeuTT9iuy36aCMTpnsmQ=; h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=nVKwquUlUtFjKEZcbV4hL2bnJRnqU2pD/P00t/3I7ZTf1bRORYtkoZkj8dvKIw6Ks xkSyz4VadAGYn1uy+xtxtvGbe/G/6Y4zP+1znb4eyWAH+aBDVIv8gfCdZI6AzFbcuT QxhusyPVsxwBYMuUmiBV8XDFIcxwYnL/gStN3Pcg= From: "anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug fortran/50410] ICE in record_reference, pointer variable in data statement Date: Fri, 29 Mar 2024 17:50:31 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: fortran X-Bugzilla-Version: 7.0 X-Bugzilla-Keywords: diagnostic, ice-on-invalid-code X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Status: REOPENED X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: P4 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 11.5 X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: short_desc keywords Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 List-Id: https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D50410 anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary|[11/12/13/14 Regression] |ICE in record_reference, |ICE in record_reference, |pointer variable in data |pointer variable in data |statement |statement | Keywords| |diagnostic --- Comment #53 from anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org --- Removing the regression marker after the ICEs on the testcases are all resolved except: - comment#24 testcase z5: this is a coarray issue and has nothing to do with DATA initialization --> should be moved to a separate PR - missing diagnostics for overlapping initialization of DT components, and some sub-optimal error messages that could be improved So let's treat this PR further as any regular one.=