From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48)
 id 14F96388C022; Sun, 21 Jun 2020 18:19:41 +0000 (GMT)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 14F96388C022
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org;
 s=default; t=1592763582;
 bh=LScMoAI4FDyh8w9EKw0GY3nJapYdpFzowtDoMeDnXYM=;
 h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From;
 b=St2joajR1GVBmoqNpEC4jLI9YGOlVcnpCfUv4/5LbqqZjxMIDaDWA5uDpeULwVjPP
 lq6zNnBKocC3KB5jjkirxkb9f/AByaGzxhIyhcEDxrqzBS6W1NUuLdGCMccipMhDHm
 q8A4tuYlInA89pPwn5QV3vvPRnULafheRL6U/gFg=
From: "anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug fortran/50410] [8/9/10/11 Regression] ICE in record_reference,
 pointer variable in data statement
Date: Sun, 21 Jun 2020 18:19:41 +0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: fortran
X-Bugzilla-Version: 7.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: ice-on-invalid-code
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: REOPENED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: 
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P4
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 11.0
X-Bugzilla-Flags: 
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: 
Message-ID: <bug-50410-4-uDfFcDLOf4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-50410-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-50410-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-BeenThere: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Gcc-bugs mailing list <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://gcc.gnu.org/mailman/options/gcc-bugs>,
 <mailto:gcc-bugs-request@gcc.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-request@gcc.gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://gcc.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gcc-bugs>,
 <mailto:gcc-bugs-request@gcc.gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 21 Jun 2020 18:19:42 -0000

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D50410

--- Comment #43 from anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to anlauf from comment #42)
> The following patch does the magic (not regtested):
>=20
> diff --git a/gcc/fortran/expr.c b/gcc/fortran/expr.c
> index 8daa7bb8d06..0a995ec3ae7 100644
> --- a/gcc/fortran/expr.c
> +++ b/gcc/fortran/expr.c
> @@ -3087,6 +3087,9 @@ gfc_reduce_init_expr (gfc_expr *expr)
>      t =3D gfc_check_init_expr (expr);
>    gfc_init_expr_flag =3D false;
>=20=20
> +  if (gfc_error_check())
> +    return false;
> +
>    if (!t || !expr)
>      return false;

This produces lots of regressions.  So this is apparently not the right pla=
ce.=