From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-402395-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: (qmail 14457 invoked by alias); 1 Oct 2012 23:30:19 -0000
Received: (qmail 14055 invoked by uid 48); 1 Oct 2012 23:30:00 -0000
From: "kkojima at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug target/50457] SH2A atomic functions
Date: Mon, 01 Oct 2012 23:30:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: target
X-Bugzilla-Keywords:
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: kkojima at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: REOPENED
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields:
Message-ID: <bug-50457-4-5uXd4GXkvA@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-50457-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-50457-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
X-SW-Source: 2012-10/txt/msg00071.txt.bz2


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50457

--- Comment #9 from Kazumoto Kojima <kkojima at gcc dot gnu.org> 2012-10-01 23:29:59 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #8)
> Would that be OK to do?

Yes, that sounds good for maintenance.