[Bug middle-end/50460] [4.7 Regression] __builtin___strcpy_chk/__builtin_object_size don't work

["jakub at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>]

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50460

--- Comment #6 from Jakub Jelinek <jakub at gcc dot gnu.org> 2011-09-26 09:08:36 UTC ---
#define strcpy(x,y) __builtin___strcpy_chk (x, y, __builtin_object_size (x, 1))

int
f1 (void)
{
  struct A { char buf1[9]; char buf2[4]; } a;
  strcpy (a.buf1 + 9, "a");
  return 0;
}

int
f2 (void)
{
  struct A { char buf1[9]; char buf2[4]; } a;
  strcpy (a.buf2 + 0, "a");
  return 0;
}

int
f3 (void)
{
  struct A { char buf1[9]; char buf2[4]; } a;
  strcpy (a.buf1 + 10, "a");
  return 0;
}

int
f4 (void)
{
  struct A { char buf1[9]; char buf2[4]; } a;
  strcpy (a.buf2 - 1, "a");
  return 0;
}

int
f5 (void)
{
  struct A { char buf1[9]; char buf2[4]; } a;
  strcpy ((char *) &a + 10, "a");
  return 0;
}

int
f6 (void)
{
  struct A { char buf1[9]; char buf2[4]; } a;
  strcpy ((char *) a.buf2 - 1, "a");
  return 0;
}

used to warn in f{1,3,4,6} (and fail at runtime) and not in f{2,5} in
4.{1,2,3,4,6} (haven't checked 4.5), doesn't warn nor fail on the trunk.
So yes, 4.0+ clearly did some reconstruction, but only in limited cases (e.g.
when the &a is offsetted).  Some field + offset remained COMPONENT_REF +
offset.