* [Bug libfortran/50487] FAIL: gfortran.dg/bessel_6.f90
2011-09-22 17:35 [Bug libfortran/50487] New: FAIL: gfortran.dg/bessel_6.f90 hjl.tools at gmail dot com
@ 2011-09-22 18:03 ` kargl at gcc dot gnu.org
2011-09-22 18:22 ` [Bug testsuite/50487] " hjl.tools at gmail dot com
` (6 subsequent siblings)
7 siblings, 0 replies; 9+ messages in thread
From: kargl at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2011-09-22 18:03 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50487
kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |kargl at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #1 from kargl at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-09-22 17:58:19 UTC ---
I've had this patch in my tree for nearly a year. I'm surprised
that glibc developers took nearly a year to apply a form of my
libm patch to their tree.
Index: gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/bessel_6.f90
===================================================================
--- gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/bessel_6.f90 (revision 179023)
+++ gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/bessel_6.f90 (working copy)
@@ -12,7 +12,7 @@
implicit none
real,parameter :: values(*) = [0.0, 0.5, 1.0, 0.9,
1.8,2.0,3.0,4.0,4.25,8.0,34.53, 475.78]
real,parameter :: myeps(size(values)) = epsilon(0.0) &
- * [2, 7, 5, 6, 9, 12, 12, 7, 7, 8, 75, 15 ]
+ * [2, 7, 5, 6, 9, 12, 12, 7, 7, 8, 92, 15 ]
! The following is sufficient for me - the values above are a bit
! more tolerant
! * [0, 5, 3, 4, 6, 7, 7, 5, 5, 6, 66, 4 ]
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread* [Bug testsuite/50487] FAIL: gfortran.dg/bessel_6.f90
2011-09-22 17:35 [Bug libfortran/50487] New: FAIL: gfortran.dg/bessel_6.f90 hjl.tools at gmail dot com
2011-09-22 18:03 ` [Bug libfortran/50487] " kargl at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2011-09-22 18:22 ` hjl.tools at gmail dot com
2011-09-22 18:23 ` sgk at troutmask dot apl.washington.edu
` (5 subsequent siblings)
7 siblings, 0 replies; 9+ messages in thread
From: hjl.tools at gmail dot com @ 2011-09-22 18:22 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50487
H.J. Lu <hjl.tools at gmail dot com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Component|libfortran |testsuite
Target Milestone|--- |4.7.0
--- Comment #2 from H.J. Lu <hjl.tools at gmail dot com> 2011-09-22 18:16:35 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #1)
> I've had this patch in my tree for nearly a year. I'm surprised
> that glibc developers took nearly a year to apply a form of my
> libm patch to their tree.
>
>
> Index: gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/bessel_6.f90
> ===================================================================
> --- gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/bessel_6.f90 (revision 179023)
> +++ gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/bessel_6.f90 (working copy)
> @@ -12,7 +12,7 @@
> implicit none
> real,parameter :: values(*) = [0.0, 0.5, 1.0, 0.9,
> 1.8,2.0,3.0,4.0,4.25,8.0,34.53, 475.78]
> real,parameter :: myeps(size(values)) = epsilon(0.0) &
> - * [2, 7, 5, 6, 9, 12, 12, 7, 7, 8, 75, 15 ]
> + * [2, 7, 5, 6, 9, 12, 12, 7, 7, 8, 92, 15 ]
> ! The following is sufficient for me - the values above are a bit
> ! more tolerant
> ! * [0, 5, 3, 4, 6, 7, 7, 5, 5, 6, 66, 4 ]
It works for me. Can you check it in?
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread* [Bug testsuite/50487] FAIL: gfortran.dg/bessel_6.f90
2011-09-22 17:35 [Bug libfortran/50487] New: FAIL: gfortran.dg/bessel_6.f90 hjl.tools at gmail dot com
2011-09-22 18:03 ` [Bug libfortran/50487] " kargl at gcc dot gnu.org
2011-09-22 18:22 ` [Bug testsuite/50487] " hjl.tools at gmail dot com
@ 2011-09-22 18:23 ` sgk at troutmask dot apl.washington.edu
2011-09-22 18:31 ` hjl.tools at gmail dot com
` (4 subsequent siblings)
7 siblings, 0 replies; 9+ messages in thread
From: sgk at troutmask dot apl.washington.edu @ 2011-09-22 18:23 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50487
--- Comment #3 from Steve Kargl <sgk at troutmask dot apl.washington.edu> 2011-09-22 18:19:07 UTC ---
On Thu, Sep 22, 2011 at 06:16:35PM +0000, hjl.tools at gmail dot com wrote:
> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50487
>
> H.J. Lu <hjl.tools at gmail dot com> changed:
>
> What |Removed |Added
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Component|libfortran |testsuite
> Target Milestone|--- |4.7.0
>
> --- Comment #2 from H.J. Lu <hjl.tools at gmail dot com> 2011-09-22 18:16:35 UTC ---
> (In reply to comment #1)
> > I've had this patch in my tree for nearly a year. I'm surprised
> > that glibc developers took nearly a year to apply a form of my
> > libm patch to their tree.
> >
> >
> > Index: gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/bessel_6.f90
> > ===================================================================
> > --- gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/bessel_6.f90 (revision 179023)
> > +++ gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/bessel_6.f90 (working copy)
> > @@ -12,7 +12,7 @@
> > implicit none
> > real,parameter :: values(*) = [0.0, 0.5, 1.0, 0.9,
> > 1.8,2.0,3.0,4.0,4.25,8.0,34.53, 475.78]
> > real,parameter :: myeps(size(values)) = epsilon(0.0) &
> > - * [2, 7, 5, 6, 9, 12, 12, 7, 7, 8, 75, 15 ]
> > + * [2, 7, 5, 6, 9, 12, 12, 7, 7, 8, 92, 15 ]
> > ! The following is sufficient for me - the values above are a bit
> > ! more tolerant
> > ! * [0, 5, 3, 4, 6, 7, 7, 5, 5, 6, 66, 4 ]
>
> It works for me. Can you check it in?
>
Sure, do you want me to apply it to 4.5 and 4.6 as well.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread* [Bug testsuite/50487] FAIL: gfortran.dg/bessel_6.f90
2011-09-22 17:35 [Bug libfortran/50487] New: FAIL: gfortran.dg/bessel_6.f90 hjl.tools at gmail dot com
` (2 preceding siblings ...)
2011-09-22 18:23 ` sgk at troutmask dot apl.washington.edu
@ 2011-09-22 18:31 ` hjl.tools at gmail dot com
2011-09-22 18:36 ` kargl at gcc dot gnu.org
` (3 subsequent siblings)
7 siblings, 0 replies; 9+ messages in thread
From: hjl.tools at gmail dot com @ 2011-09-22 18:31 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50487
--- Comment #4 from H.J. Lu <hjl.tools at gmail dot com> 2011-09-22 18:22:25 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #3)
> >
> > It works for me. Can you check it in?
> >
>
> Sure, do you want me to apply it to 4.5 and 4.6 as well.
Yes, please.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread* [Bug testsuite/50487] FAIL: gfortran.dg/bessel_6.f90
2011-09-22 17:35 [Bug libfortran/50487] New: FAIL: gfortran.dg/bessel_6.f90 hjl.tools at gmail dot com
` (3 preceding siblings ...)
2011-09-22 18:31 ` hjl.tools at gmail dot com
@ 2011-09-22 18:36 ` kargl at gcc dot gnu.org
2011-09-22 18:36 ` kargl at gcc dot gnu.org
` (2 subsequent siblings)
7 siblings, 0 replies; 9+ messages in thread
From: kargl at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2011-09-22 18:36 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50487
--- Comment #5 from kargl at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-09-22 18:28:18 UTC ---
Author: kargl
Date: Thu Sep 22 18:28:14 2011
New Revision: 179097
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=179097
Log:
2011-09-22 Steven G. Kargl <kargl@gcc.gnu.org>
PR testsuite/50487
* gfortran.dg/bessel_6.f90: Fix tolerance test.
Modified:
trunk/gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog
trunk/gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/bessel_6.f90
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread* [Bug testsuite/50487] FAIL: gfortran.dg/bessel_6.f90
2011-09-22 17:35 [Bug libfortran/50487] New: FAIL: gfortran.dg/bessel_6.f90 hjl.tools at gmail dot com
` (4 preceding siblings ...)
2011-09-22 18:36 ` kargl at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2011-09-22 18:36 ` kargl at gcc dot gnu.org
2011-09-22 18:42 ` kargl at gcc dot gnu.org
2011-09-22 18:43 ` sgk at troutmask dot apl.washington.edu
7 siblings, 0 replies; 9+ messages in thread
From: kargl at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2011-09-22 18:36 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50487
--- Comment #6 from kargl at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-09-22 18:30:42 UTC ---
Author: kargl
Date: Thu Sep 22 18:30:36 2011
New Revision: 179098
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=179098
Log:
011-09-22 Steven G. Kargl <kargl@gcc.gnu.org>
PR testsuite/50487
* gfortran.dg/bessel_6.f90: Fix tolerance test.
Modified:
branches/gcc-4_6-branch/gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog
branches/gcc-4_6-branch/gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/bessel_6.f90
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread* [Bug testsuite/50487] FAIL: gfortran.dg/bessel_6.f90
2011-09-22 17:35 [Bug libfortran/50487] New: FAIL: gfortran.dg/bessel_6.f90 hjl.tools at gmail dot com
` (5 preceding siblings ...)
2011-09-22 18:36 ` kargl at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2011-09-22 18:42 ` kargl at gcc dot gnu.org
2011-09-22 18:43 ` sgk at troutmask dot apl.washington.edu
7 siblings, 0 replies; 9+ messages in thread
From: kargl at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2011-09-22 18:42 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50487
kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution| |FIXED
--- Comment #8 from kargl at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-09-22 18:35:30 UTC ---
Fixed.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread* [Bug testsuite/50487] FAIL: gfortran.dg/bessel_6.f90
2011-09-22 17:35 [Bug libfortran/50487] New: FAIL: gfortran.dg/bessel_6.f90 hjl.tools at gmail dot com
` (6 preceding siblings ...)
2011-09-22 18:42 ` kargl at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2011-09-22 18:43 ` sgk at troutmask dot apl.washington.edu
7 siblings, 0 replies; 9+ messages in thread
From: sgk at troutmask dot apl.washington.edu @ 2011-09-22 18:43 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50487
--- Comment #7 from Steve Kargl <sgk at troutmask dot apl.washington.edu> 2011-09-22 18:35:09 UTC ---
On Thu, Sep 22, 2011 at 06:22:25PM +0000, hjl.tools at gmail dot com wrote:
> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50487
>
> --- Comment #4 from H.J. Lu <hjl.tools at gmail dot com> 2011-09-22 18:22:25 UTC ---
> (In reply to comment #3)
> > >
> > > It works for me. Can you check it in?
> > >
> >
> > Sure, do you want me to apply it to 4.5 and 4.6 as well.
>
> Yes, please.
>
Fixed on 4.6 and trunk. bessel_6.f90 only exists on these branches.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread