From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-368551-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: (qmail 6408 invoked by alias); 23 Sep 2011 23:06:20 -0000
Received: (qmail 6396 invoked by uid 22791); 23 Sep 2011 23:06:18 -0000
X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.9 required=5.0	tests=ALL_TRUSTED,AWL,BAYES_00
X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org
Received: from localhost (HELO gcc.gnu.org) (127.0.0.1)    by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Fri, 23 Sep 2011 23:06:05 +0000
From: "jason at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug c++/50500] New: [C++0x] [DR 1082] move constructor should cause copy constructor to be deleted, but still declared
Date: Fri, 23 Sep 2011 23:59:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: new
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: c++
X-Bugzilla-Keywords:
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: jason at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: UNCONFIRMED
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields:
Message-ID: <bug-50500-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
X-SW-Source: 2011-09/txt/msg01728.txt.bz2

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50500

             Bug #: 50500
           Summary: [C++0x] [DR 1082] move constructor should cause copy
                    constructor to be deleted, but still declared
    Classification: Unclassified
           Product: gcc
           Version: 4.7.0
            Status: UNCONFIRMED
          Severity: normal
          Priority: P3
         Component: c++
        AssignedTo: unassigned@gcc.gnu.org
        ReportedBy: jason@gcc.gnu.org


G++ still suppresses the copy constructor declaration when there is a move
constructor, which was changed by DR 1082.

This should complain about a deleted function:


template <class T> T&& move(T& t);

struct X
{
  X() : x(1) {}
  explicit X(X&& other) : x(other.x) { other.x = -1; }
  int x;
};

int main()
{
  X x;
  X x2 = move(x); // { dg-error "deleted" }                                     
}