From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-368749-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: (qmail 1247 invoked by alias); 26 Sep 2011 10:37:10 -0000
Received: (qmail 1206 invoked by uid 22791); 26 Sep 2011 10:37:09 -0000
X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.9 required=5.0	tests=ALL_TRUSTED,AWL,BAYES_00
X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org
Received: from localhost (HELO gcc.gnu.org) (127.0.0.1)    by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Mon, 26 Sep 2011 10:36:56 +0000
From: "rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug tree-optimization/50522] C++ std::valarray vectorization missed optimization
Date: Mon, 26 Sep 2011 10:47:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: tree-optimization
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: missed-optimization
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Status Last reconfirmed Ever Confirmed
Message-ID: <bug-50522-4-a0islns12s@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-50522-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-50522-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
X-SW-Source: 2011-09/txt/msg01926.txt.bz2

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50522

Richard Guenther <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|UNCONFIRMED                 |NEW
   Last reconfirmed|                            |2011-09-26
     Ever Confirmed|0                           |1

--- Comment #2 from Richard Guenther <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> 2011-09-26 10:36:38 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #1)
> Created attachment 25365 [details]
> gcc47-pr50522-hack.patch
> 
> The perhaps safer hack, which handles only pointers initialized from
> casted TYPE_RESTRICT or POINTER_PLUS_EXPR of TYPE_RESTRICT.  Both functions are
> still vectorized.

Looks like a hack ;)

Restrict support was designed to work without the TYPE_RESTRICT checks but
ISTR there were miscompiles without adding them - maybe all latent issues
have been fixed now, but you might run into PR48764 more often.

Restrict will propagate through ptr/int/ptr conversions but should end up
aliased whenever two resulting pointers are based off the same initial
restrict tag.  Thus, if removing TYPE_RESTRICT checks bootstraps and tests
ok, I'd approve that patch ...