public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [Bug middle-end/50528] New: [4.7 Regression] SPEC CPU 2006 failed to build with LTO
@ 2011-09-26 17:07 hjl.tools at gmail dot com
2011-09-26 18:11 ` [Bug middle-end/50528] " hjl.tools at gmail dot com
` (3 more replies)
0 siblings, 4 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: hjl.tools at gmail dot com @ 2011-09-26 17:07 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50528
Bug #: 50528
Summary: [4.7 Regression] SPEC CPU 2006 failed to build with
LTO
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: middle-end
AssignedTo: unassigned@gcc.gnu.org
ReportedBy: hjl.tools@gmail.com
On Linux/x86-64, revision 179164 failed to build 416.gamess,
447.dealII and 481.wrf with LTO. Failure is
gfortran -O2 -ffast-math -fwhole-program -flto=jobserver -fuse-linker-plugin
-DSPEC_CPU_LP64 ...
lto1: internal compiler error: in account_size_time, at
ipa-inline-analysis.c:601
Please submit a full bug report,
with preprocessed source if appropriate.
See <http://gcc.gnu.org/bugs.html> for instructions.
lto-wrapper: gfortran returned 1 exit status
/usr/local/bin/ld: lto-wrapper failed
collect2: error: ld returned 1 exit status
Revision 179104 is OK.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread* [Bug middle-end/50528] [4.7 Regression] SPEC CPU 2006 failed to build with LTO 2011-09-26 17:07 [Bug middle-end/50528] New: [4.7 Regression] SPEC CPU 2006 failed to build with LTO hjl.tools at gmail dot com @ 2011-09-26 18:11 ` hjl.tools at gmail dot com 2011-09-26 18:29 ` hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org ` (2 subsequent siblings) 3 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread From: hjl.tools at gmail dot com @ 2011-09-26 18:11 UTC (permalink / raw) To: gcc-bugs http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50528 H.J. Lu <hjl.tools at gmail dot com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org Target Milestone|--- |4.7.0 --- Comment #1 from H.J. Lu <hjl.tools at gmail dot com> 2011-09-26 17:45:59 UTC --- It is caused by revision 179126: http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-cvs/2011-09/msg00745.html ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* [Bug middle-end/50528] [4.7 Regression] SPEC CPU 2006 failed to build with LTO 2011-09-26 17:07 [Bug middle-end/50528] New: [4.7 Regression] SPEC CPU 2006 failed to build with LTO hjl.tools at gmail dot com 2011-09-26 18:11 ` [Bug middle-end/50528] " hjl.tools at gmail dot com @ 2011-09-26 18:29 ` hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-09-27 9:21 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-10-10 14:21 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org 3 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread From: hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2011-09-26 18:29 UTC (permalink / raw) To: gcc-bugs http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50528 --- Comment #2 from Jan Hubicka <hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org> 2011-09-26 18:16:33 UTC --- Looks like overflow in the fixed point scalling code. Will look into that. ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* [Bug middle-end/50528] [4.7 Regression] SPEC CPU 2006 failed to build with LTO 2011-09-26 17:07 [Bug middle-end/50528] New: [4.7 Regression] SPEC CPU 2006 failed to build with LTO hjl.tools at gmail dot com 2011-09-26 18:11 ` [Bug middle-end/50528] " hjl.tools at gmail dot com 2011-09-26 18:29 ` hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2011-09-27 9:21 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-10-10 14:21 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org 3 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread From: rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2011-09-27 9:21 UTC (permalink / raw) To: gcc-bugs http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50528 Richard Guenther <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed| |2011-09-27 Ever Confirmed|0 |1 --- Comment #3 from Richard Guenther <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> 2011-09-27 08:59:52 UTC --- Confirmed. ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* [Bug middle-end/50528] [4.7 Regression] SPEC CPU 2006 failed to build with LTO 2011-09-26 17:07 [Bug middle-end/50528] New: [4.7 Regression] SPEC CPU 2006 failed to build with LTO hjl.tools at gmail dot com ` (2 preceding siblings ...) 2011-09-27 9:21 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2011-10-10 14:21 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org 3 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread From: rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2011-10-10 14:21 UTC (permalink / raw) To: gcc-bugs http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50528 Richard Guenther <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution| |FIXED --- Comment #4 from Richard Guenther <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> 2011-10-10 14:20:48 UTC --- Works again. ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2011-10-10 14:21 UTC | newest] Thread overview: 5+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed) -- links below jump to the message on this page -- 2011-09-26 17:07 [Bug middle-end/50528] New: [4.7 Regression] SPEC CPU 2006 failed to build with LTO hjl.tools at gmail dot com 2011-09-26 18:11 ` [Bug middle-end/50528] " hjl.tools at gmail dot com 2011-09-26 18:29 ` hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-09-27 9:21 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-10-10 14:21 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox; as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).