From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-426413-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: (qmail 16195 invoked by alias); 20 Jul 2013 20:23:54 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 13991 invoked by uid 48); 20 Jul 2013 20:21:51 -0000
From: "burnus at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug fortran/50536] an input item shall not appear as the do-variable of any io-implied-do
Date: Sat, 20 Jul 2013 20:23:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: fortran
X-Bugzilla-Version: 4.7.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: accepts-invalid, diagnostic, patch
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: burnus at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags:
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: keywords cc
Message-ID: <bug-50536-4-PrS3umbeuW@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-50536-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-50536-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SW-Source: 2013-07/txt/msg00920.txt.bz2

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50536

Tobias Burnus <burnus at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
           Keywords|                            |accepts-invalid,
                   |                            |diagnostic, patch
                 CC|                            |burnus at gcc dot gnu.org

--- Comment #5 from Tobias Burnus <burnus at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
Simple - and completely untested - patch. I am not quite sure whether nested
io-implied-dos can appear - if they can, the patch would be insufficient.
However, I cannot come up with any nested io-implied-do for READ (which
requires the items to be variables). Hence, the patch is presumably sufficient.

--- a/gcc/fortran/io.c
+++ b/gcc/fortran/io.c
@@ -3057,2 +3057,12 @@ match_io_iterator (io_kind k, gfc_code **result)

+  if (k == M_READ)
+    for (new_code = head; new_code; new_code = head->next)
+      if (iter->var->symtree == new_code->expr1->symtree)
+       {
+         gfc_error ("In a READ statement, the input item at %L shall not "
+                    "be the do-variable of any io-implied-do");
+         m = MATCH_ERROR;
+         goto cleanup;
+       }
+
   new_code = gfc_get_code ();