From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-426429-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: (qmail 20535 invoked by alias); 21 Jul 2013 09:50:10 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 18188 invoked by uid 48); 21 Jul 2013 09:48:06 -0000
From: "burnus at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug fortran/50536] an input item shall not appear as the do-variable of any io-implied-do
Date: Sun, 21 Jul 2013 09:50:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: fortran
X-Bugzilla-Version: 4.7.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: accepts-invalid, diagnostic, patch
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: burnus at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags:
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields:
Message-ID: <bug-50536-4-XEkZXMVMdN@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-50536-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-50536-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SW-Source: 2013-07/txt/msg00936.txt.bz2

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50536

--- Comment #7 from Tobias Burnus <burnus at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
> it is insufficient as it does not take care of, e.g.
>    (foo%a(foo%i), foo%i = 1,5)
> which is odd but valid.

Or the following (for i /= j): (foo(i)%i, foo(j)%i = 1, 5).