From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-372337-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: (qmail 11064 invoked by alias); 29 Oct 2011 16:51:43 -0000
Received: (qmail 11054 invoked by uid 22791); 29 Oct 2011 16:51:42 -0000
X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.8 required=5.0	tests=ALL_TRUSTED,AWL,BAYES_00,TW_SG
X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org
Received: from localhost (HELO gcc.gnu.org) (127.0.0.1)    by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Sat, 29 Oct 2011 16:51:27 +0000
From: "sgk at troutmask dot apl.washington.edu" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug fortran/50556] cannot save namelist group name
Date: Sat, 29 Oct 2011 16:51:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: fortran
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: accepts-invalid
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: sgk at troutmask dot apl.washington.edu
X-Bugzilla-Status: UNCONFIRMED
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields:
Message-ID: <bug-50556-4-4e2OTQiLOk@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-50556-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-50556-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
X-SW-Source: 2011-10/txt/msg03081.txt.bz2

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50556

--- Comment #5 from Steve Kargl <sgk at troutmask dot apl.washington.edu> 2011-10-29 16:51:10 UTC ---
On Sat, Oct 29, 2011 at 03:17:19PM +0000, burnus at gcc dot gnu.org wrote:
> >From c.l.f:
> > Unfortunately, I also found that gfortran has interpreted something like
> >      namelist /cmd/ i, j, k
> >      save cmd
> > to mean
> >     namelist /cmd/ i, j, k
> >     save i, j, k
> 
> The question is whether one needs to allow it.
> 
> g95 and gfortran allow the code
> ifort, NAG f95, g77 (!), pathf95/openf95/crayftn reject it.
> PGI warns "Symbol, i, appears illegally in a SAVE statement"
> 
> Thus, I wouldn't mind breaking the backward compatibility.

I vote that gfortran should follow the majority and simply
issue an error.