From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-369031-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: (qmail 29077 invoked by alias); 29 Sep 2011 07:18:17 -0000
Received: (qmail 29012 invoked by uid 22791); 29 Sep 2011 07:18:15 -0000
X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.9 required=5.0	tests=ALL_TRUSTED,AWL,BAYES_00
X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org
Received: from localhost (HELO gcc.gnu.org) (127.0.0.1)    by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Thu, 29 Sep 2011 07:18:01 +0000
From: "ethouris at gmail dot com" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug c++/50563] New: Weird syntax acceptance rules for non-static data members initialized in place (C++0x)
Date: Thu, 29 Sep 2011 08:19:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: new
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: c++
X-Bugzilla-Keywords:
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: ethouris at gmail dot com
X-Bugzilla-Status: UNCONFIRMED
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields:
Message-ID: <bug-50563-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
X-SW-Source: 2011-09/txt/msg02208.txt.bz2

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D50563

             Bug #: 50563
           Summary: Weird syntax acceptance rules for non-static data
                    members initialized in place (C++0x)
    Classification: Unclassified
           Product: gcc
           Version: 4.7.0
            Status: UNCONFIRMED
          Severity: normal
          Priority: P3
         Component: c++
        AssignedTo: unassigned@gcc.gnu.org
        ReportedBy: ethouris@gmail.com


In the latest version it's possible to initialize data in place.

According to the standard, non-static data members can be initialized with:

  int a =3D 0;

or

  int a {0};

and not with the constructor syntax:

  int a (0);

However there are probably no strict rules how the "list of variables" can =
be
initialized. I state that it should be normally allowed. Actually gcc accep=
ts
the following syntax:

 int a {10}, b {20};

as well as:

 int a, b =3D 20;

but this one:

 int a =3D 10, b =3D 20;

ends up with the following error message:

 error: expected =E2=80=98;=E2=80=99 before =E2=80=98,=E2=80=99 token

I'm not completely sure, but it should be just strict rule: either the list=
 of
variables syntax is not allowed when the variables are also initialized (so=
 int
a,b=3D20; should fail too), or the list of variables syntax should be suppo=
rted
as usual.