From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 16534 invoked by alias); 29 Sep 2011 18:29:52 -0000 Received: (qmail 16518 invoked by uid 22791); 29 Sep 2011 18:29:51 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.9 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,AWL,BAYES_00 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from localhost (HELO gcc.gnu.org) (127.0.0.1) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Thu, 29 Sep 2011 18:29:38 +0000 From: "hjl.tools at gmail dot com" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug lto/50568] [4.7 Regression] Massive LTO failures Date: Thu, 29 Sep 2011 18:45:00 -0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: lto X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: hjl.tools at gmail dot com X-Bugzilla-Status: UNCONFIRMED X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 4.7.0 X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Depends on Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org X-SW-Source: 2011-09/txt/msg02311.txt.bz2 http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50568 H.J. Lu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Depends on| |34835 --- Comment #16 from H.J. Lu 2011-09-29 18:29:19 UTC --- (In reply to comment #15) > Hmm good point. > > Maybe the splay tree can be fixed. Otherwise have to use 32bit ids on 32bit, > but then the risk of collisions is higher again. See PR 34835.