From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 23664 invoked by alias); 3 Oct 2011 04:14:36 -0000 Received: (qmail 23652 invoked by uid 22791); 3 Oct 2011 04:14:34 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.9 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,AWL,BAYES_00 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from localhost (HELO gcc.gnu.org) (127.0.0.1) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Mon, 03 Oct 2011 04:14:20 +0000 From: "zackw at panix dot com" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug c++/50595] New: template overload resolution insufficiently sensitive to name dependency? Date: Mon, 03 Oct 2011 04:14:00 -0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: new X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: c++ X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: zackw at panix dot com X-Bugzilla-Status: UNCONFIRMED X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: --- X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org X-SW-Source: 2011-10/txt/msg00081.txt.bz2 http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50595 Bug #: 50595 Summary: template overload resolution insufficiently sensitive to name dependency? Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.6.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: c++ AssignedTo: unassigned@gcc.gnu.org ReportedBy: zackw@panix.com Created attachment 25401 --> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=25401 test case Per http://stackoverflow.com/questions/7630806 the expected output of the attached test case should be f(char): 1 f(int): T(1) f(int): t f(char): 1 f(char): T(1) f(char): t since the second and third calls to f() in g() have arguments that are template-dependent, so resolution of *those* function calls (but not the first call) should be deferred until the point of instantiation (h()), at which time both f(int) and f(char) are visible. What actually happens with g++ 4.6 is f(char): 1 f(char): T(1) f(char): t f(char): 1 f(char): T(1) f(char): t I'm not 100% convinced by the argument above, but I am convinced enough to see what y'all think.