From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-390760-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: (qmail 5388 invoked by alias); 4 May 2012 08:18:53 -0000
Received: (qmail 5362 invoked by uid 22791); 4 May 2012 08:18:48 -0000
X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-4.3 required=5.0	tests=ALL_TRUSTED,AWL,BAYES_00,KHOP_THREADED
X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org
Received: from localhost (HELO gcc.gnu.org) (127.0.0.1)    by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Fri, 04 May 2012 08:18:24 +0000
From: "rguenther at suse dot de" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug lto/50602] ICE in tree_nrv, at tree-nrv.c:155 during large LTO build
Date: Fri, 04 May 2012 08:18:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: lto
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: ice-on-invalid-code
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: rguenther at suse dot de
X-Bugzilla-Status: ASSIGNED
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 4.8.0
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields:
Message-ID: <bug-50602-4-Vd6Q8fp6MS@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-50602-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-50602-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
X-SW-Source: 2012-05/txt/msg00378.txt.bz2

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50602

--- Comment #18 from rguenther at suse dot de <rguenther at suse dot de> 2012-05-04 08:17:57 UTC ---
On Thu, 3 May 2012, andi-gcc at firstfloor dot org wrote:

> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50602
> 
> --- Comment #17 from Andi Kleen <andi-gcc at firstfloor dot org> 2012-05-03 14:57:13 UTC ---
> Hmm, my assumption was always that this option would be passed through and then
> used by lto1 step. That's true  for other -f* options at least.

No, we do

  /* The following does what the old LTO option code did,
     union all target and a selected set of common options.  */
  for (i = 0; i < fdecoded_options_count; ++i)
    {
      struct cl_decoded_option *foption = &fdecoded_options[i];
      switch (foption->opt_index)
        {
        default:
          if (!(cl_options[foption->opt_index].flags & CL_TARGET))
            break;

thus only pass through all target options and the explicitely listed
set of common options.