public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "jakub at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org> To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug other/50636] GC in large LTO builds cause excessive fragmentation in memory map Date: Sat, 08 Oct 2011 20:14:00 -0000 [thread overview] Message-ID: <bug-50636-4-r5yb7etXnL@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/> (raw) In-Reply-To: <bug-50636-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50636 --- Comment #13 from Jakub Jelinek <jakub at gcc dot gnu.org> 2011-10-08 20:14:14 UTC --- In the 0001-initial-madvise.patch patch I think if you subtract the size MADV_DONTNEEDed from G.bytes_mapped, then you should add it again in alloc_page (i.e. replace + p->unmapped = false; + you've added there with: + if (p->unmapped) + G.bytes_mapped += p->bytes; + p->unmapped = false; + Not sure if it is enough as is with that change, or if more is needed - like also keeping track of the size of currently MADV_DONTNEED bytes and if it grows too much together with G.bytes_mapped, consider really munmapping some of the pages (perhaps try to sort the free list by increasing size, so that further allocations will prefer the smaller blocks over the larger ones, and if getting close to filled address space, consider freeing some of the largest one in case malloc would be requested. Or alternatively, hook into xmalloc_failed and if malloc fails, try to free some of the largest chunks and retry. I'm just worried if at some point during the compilation we need huge amount of GC memory, close to filling 32-bit address space, then we GC collect lots of it, but on the other side would need a lot of malloced memory. But perhaps that is unlikely to happen.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-10-08 20:14 UTC|newest] Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top 2011-10-06 18:21 [Bug other/50636] New: " andi-gcc at firstfloor dot org 2011-10-06 19:20 ` Jan Hubicka 2011-10-06 19:21 ` [Bug other/50636] " hubicka at ucw dot cz 2011-10-06 21:29 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-10-06 21:32 ` andi-gcc at firstfloor dot org 2011-10-06 21:42 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-10-06 21:47 ` andi-gcc at firstfloor dot org 2011-10-07 5:49 ` andi-gcc at firstfloor dot org 2011-10-07 5:51 ` andi-gcc at firstfloor dot org 2011-10-07 8:25 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-10-07 10:01 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-10-07 14:45 ` andi-gcc at firstfloor dot org 2011-10-08 16:48 ` andi-gcc at firstfloor dot org 2011-10-08 19:55 ` andi-gcc at firstfloor dot org 2011-10-08 20:14 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org [this message] 2011-10-08 21:10 ` andi-gcc at firstfloor dot org 2011-10-17 14:44 ` ak at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-10-20 0:11 ` andi-gcc at firstfloor dot org
Reply instructions: You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email using any one of the following methods: * Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client, and reply-to-all from there: mbox Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style * Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to switches of git-send-email(1): git send-email \ --in-reply-to=bug-50636-4-r5yb7etXnL@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ \ --to=gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org \ --cc=gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org \ /path/to/YOUR_REPLY https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html * If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header via mailto: links, try the mailto: linkBe sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox; as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).