From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 6135 invoked by alias); 6 Nov 2011 18:17:04 -0000 Received: (qmail 6122 invoked by uid 22791); 6 Nov 2011 18:17:02 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.9 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,AWL,BAYES_00 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from localhost (HELO gcc.gnu.org) (127.0.0.1) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Sun, 06 Nov 2011 18:16:48 +0000 From: "janus at gcc dot gnu.org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug middle-end/50640] [4.7 Regression] FAIL: gfortran.dg/select_type_12.f03 -O (internal compiler error) Date: Sun, 06 Nov 2011 18:17:00 -0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: middle-end X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: janus at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW X-Bugzilla-Priority: P1 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 4.7.0 X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org X-SW-Source: 2011-11/txt/msg00521.txt.bz2 http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50640 --- Comment #14 from janus at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-11-06 18:16:00 UTC --- (In reply to comment #12) > > Wouldn't standard procedure be to revert the offending patch? > > Well, first, I am not sure that the "offending patch" is identified yet According to comment 0 and comment 8, it should be between 179600 and 179611. I have to admit that I don't see any obvious candidate at first sight, but maybe someone else does? (Half of the commits in this range is not even on the trunk.)