public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "ro at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org> To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug target/50655] New: Many of the new VIS2/VIS3 tests FAIL on Solaris Date: Fri, 07 Oct 2011 10:29:00 -0000 [thread overview] Message-ID: <bug-50655-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/> (raw) http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50655 Bug #: 50655 Summary: Many of the new VIS2/VIS3 tests FAIL on Solaris Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: target AssignedTo: unassigned@gcc.gnu.org ReportedBy: ro@gcc.gnu.org CC: davem@davemloft.net, ebotcazou@gcc.gnu.org Host: sparc-sun-solaris2.1[01] Target: sparc-sun-solaris2.1[01] Build: sparc-sun-solaris2.1[01] As of rev 179598, many of the new VIS2/VIS3 tests FAIL on Solaris 10 and 11, both with Sun as and gas 2.21.1: FAIL: gcc.target/sparc/cmask.c scan-assembler cmask8\\t% FAIL: gcc.target/sparc/cmask.c scan-assembler cmask16\\t% FAIL: gcc.target/sparc/cmask.c scan-assembler cmask32\\t% FAIL: gcc.target/sparc/combined-1.c scan-assembler-times fandnot1\\t% 4 FAIL: gcc.target/sparc/combined-1.c scan-assembler-times for\\t% 4 FAIL: gcc.target/sparc/combined-1.c scan-assembler-times fxor\\t% 4 FAIL: gcc.target/sparc/fhalve.c scan-assembler fhadds\\t% FAIL: gcc.target/sparc/fhalve.c scan-assembler fhaddd\\t% FAIL: gcc.target/sparc/fhalve.c scan-assembler fhsubs\\t% FAIL: gcc.target/sparc/fhalve.c scan-assembler fhsubd\\t% FAIL: gcc.target/sparc/fhalve.c scan-assembler fnhadds\\t% FAIL: gcc.target/sparc/fhalve.c scan-assembler fnhaddd\\t% FAIL: gcc.target/sparc/fnegop.c scan-assembler fnadds\\t% FAIL: gcc.target/sparc/fnegop.c scan-assembler fnaddd\\t% FAIL: gcc.target/sparc/fnegop.c scan-assembler fnmuls\\t% FAIL: gcc.target/sparc/fnegop.c scan-assembler fnmuld\\t% FAIL: gcc.target/sparc/fnegop.c scan-assembler fnsmuld\\t% FAIL: gcc.target/sparc/fpadds.c (test for excess errors) UNRESOLVED: gcc.target/sparc/fpadds.c scan-assembler fpadds16\\t% UNRESOLVED: gcc.target/sparc/fpadds.c scan-assembler fpadds16s\\t% UNRESOLVED: gcc.target/sparc/fpadds.c scan-assembler fpsubs16\\t% UNRESOLVED: gcc.target/sparc/fpadds.c scan-assembler fpsubs16s\\t% UNRESOLVED: gcc.target/sparc/fpadds.c scan-assembler fpadds32\\t% UNRESOLVED: gcc.target/sparc/fpadds.c scan-assembler fpadds32s\\t% UNRESOLVED: gcc.target/sparc/fpadds.c scan-assembler fpsubs32\\t% UNRESOLVED: gcc.target/sparc/fpadds.c scan-assembler fpsubs32s\\t% FAIL: gcc.target/sparc/fshift.c (test for excess errors) UNRESOLVED: gcc.target/sparc/fshift.c scan-assembler fsll16\\t% UNRESOLVED: gcc.target/sparc/fshift.c scan-assembler fslas16\\t% UNRESOLVED: gcc.target/sparc/fshift.c scan-assembler fsrl16\\t% UNRESOLVED: gcc.target/sparc/fshift.c scan-assembler fsra16\\t% UNRESOLVED: gcc.target/sparc/fshift.c scan-assembler fsll32\\t% UNRESOLVED: gcc.target/sparc/fshift.c scan-assembler fslas32\\t% UNRESOLVED: gcc.target/sparc/fshift.c scan-assembler fsrl32\\t% UNRESOLVED: gcc.target/sparc/fshift.c scan-assembler fsra32\\t% FAIL: gcc.target/sparc/fucmp.c scan-assembler fucmple8\\t% FAIL: gcc.target/sparc/fucmp.c scan-assembler fucmpne8\\t% FAIL: gcc.target/sparc/fucmp.c scan-assembler fucmpgt8\\t% FAIL: gcc.target/sparc/fucmp.c scan-assembler fucmpeq8\\t% FAIL: gcc.target/sparc/lzd.c scan-assembler-times lzd\\t% 3 FAIL: gcc.target/sparc/vis3misc.c (test for excess errors) UNRESOLVED: gcc.target/sparc/vis3misc.c scan-assembler fchksm16\\t% UNRESOLVED: gcc.target/sparc/vis3misc.c scan-assembler pdistn\\t% UNRESOLVED: gcc.target/sparc/vis3misc.c scan-assembler fmean16\\t% UNRESOLVED: gcc.target/sparc/vis3misc.c scan-assembler fpadd64\\t% UNRESOLVED: gcc.target/sparc/vis3misc.c scan-assembler fpsub64\\t% FAIL: gcc.target/sparc/xmul.c scan-assembler umulxhi\\t% FAIL: gcc.target/sparc/xmul.c scan-assembler xmulx\\t% FAIL: gcc.target/sparc/xmul.c scan-assembler xmulxhi\\t% The problem seems to be the same everywhere: $ /var/gcc/regression/trunk/11-gcc/build/gcc/xgcc -B/var/gcc/regression/trunk/11-gcc/build/gcc/ /vol/gcc/src/hg/trunk/local/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/sparc/cmask.c -mcpu=niagara3 -mvis -S -o cmask.s $ grep cmask cmask.s .file "cmask.c" call __builtin_vis_cmask8, 0 call __builtin_vis_cmask16, 0 call __builtin_vis_cmask32, 0 Rainer
next reply other threads:[~2011-10-07 10:29 UTC|newest] Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top 2011-10-07 10:29 ro at gcc dot gnu.org [this message] 2011-10-07 15:02 ` [Bug target/50655] " davem at davemloft dot net 2011-10-07 15:17 ` ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE 2011-10-07 16:48 ` davem at davemloft dot net 2011-10-07 16:52 ` ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE 2011-10-07 17:24 ` davem at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-10-27 13:26 ` ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org
Reply instructions: You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email using any one of the following methods: * Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client, and reply-to-all from there: mbox Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style * Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to switches of git-send-email(1): git send-email \ --in-reply-to=bug-50655-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ \ --to=gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org \ --cc=gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org \ /path/to/YOUR_REPLY https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html * If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header via mailto: links, try the mailto: linkBe sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox; as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).