public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "janus at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org> To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug fortran/50659] [4.4/4.5/4.6/4.7 Regression] [F03] ICE with PROCEDURE statement Date: Sat, 08 Oct 2011 11:20:00 -0000 [thread overview] Message-ID: <bug-50659-4-6f19fPlsqW@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/> (raw) In-Reply-To: <bug-50659-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50659 --- Comment #10 from janus at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-10-08 11:19:07 UTC --- One more side note: The following variant segfaults with 4.3: module Test_Mod implicit none contains subroutine Init procedure(Proc1) :: Proc_Get end subroutine function Proc1() result (res) double precision, dimension(3) :: res end function end module while 4.4 rejects it with: procedure(Proc1) :: Proc_Get 1 Error: Interface 'proc1' of procedure 'proc_get' at (1) must be explicit Since this is not a regression (and 4.3 is not being maintained any more, anyway), it probably won't get fixed. From 4.5 on it is accepted.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-10-08 11:20 UTC|newest] Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top 2011-10-07 17:20 [Bug fortran/50659] New: ICE on invalid with procedure interface abenson at caltech dot edu 2011-10-07 18:23 ` [Bug fortran/50659] [F03] " janus at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-10-07 18:46 ` janus at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-10-07 19:33 ` janus at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-10-07 20:37 ` janus at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-10-07 20:43 ` [Bug fortran/50659] [4.5/4.6/4.7 Regression] " janus at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-10-07 23:06 ` janus at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-10-08 10:49 ` [Bug fortran/50659] [4.5/4.6/4.7 Regression] [F03] ICE with PROCEDURE statement janus at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-10-08 10:55 ` dominiq at lps dot ens.fr 2011-10-08 11:12 ` [Bug fortran/50659] [4.4/4.5/4.6/4.7 " janus at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-10-08 11:20 ` janus at gcc dot gnu.org [this message] 2011-10-08 15:09 ` janus at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-10-09 11:34 ` janus at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-10-10 11:31 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-10-12 18:54 ` janus at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-10-13 15:04 ` janus at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-10-15 12:16 ` janus at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-10-15 12:18 ` janus at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-10-20 12:37 ` dodji at gcc dot gnu.org
Reply instructions: You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email using any one of the following methods: * Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client, and reply-to-all from there: mbox Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style * Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to switches of git-send-email(1): git send-email \ --in-reply-to=bug-50659-4-6f19fPlsqW@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ \ --to=gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org \ --cc=gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org \ /path/to/YOUR_REPLY https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html * If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header via mailto: links, try the mailto: linkBe sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox; as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).