From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-370244-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: (qmail 18702 invoked by alias); 11 Oct 2011 12:04:14 -0000
Received: (qmail 18682 invoked by uid 22791); 11 Oct 2011 12:04:13 -0000
X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.9 required=5.0	tests=ALL_TRUSTED,AWL,BAYES_00
X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org
Received: from localhost (HELO gcc.gnu.org) (127.0.0.1)    by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Tue, 11 Oct 2011 12:03:56 +0000
From: "bernds at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug libstdc++/50661] std::equal should use more efficient version for arrays of pointers
Date: Tue, 11 Oct 2011 12:04:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: libstdc++
X-Bugzilla-Keywords:
X-Bugzilla-Severity: enhancement
X-Bugzilla-Who: bernds at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: CC
Message-ID: <bug-50661-4-XCkCsTufQ1@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-50661-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-50661-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
X-SW-Source: 2011-10/txt/msg00988.txt.bz2

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50661

Bernd Schmidt <bernds at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |bernds at gcc dot gnu.org

--- Comment #18 from Bernd Schmidt <bernds at gcc dot gnu.org> 2011-10-11 12:03:09 UTC ---
I think there are better people to answer ARM questions, but to the best of my
knowledge, there is no problem on that target.

I've tried to grep for something that might have an issue, and only found a

(define_expand "canonicalize_funcptr_for_compare"

and

/* We need a libcall to canonicalize function pointers on TARGET_ELF32.  */
#define CANONICALIZE_FUNCPTR_FOR_COMPARE_LIBCALL \
  "__canonicalize_funcptr_for_compare"

in config/pa.