From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-370867-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: (qmail 2611 invoked by alias); 17 Oct 2011 12:15:10 -0000
Received: (qmail 2545 invoked by uid 22791); 17 Oct 2011 12:15:05 -0000
X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.9 required=5.0	tests=ALL_TRUSTED,AWL,BAYES_00
X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org
Received: from localhost (HELO gcc.gnu.org) (127.0.0.1)    by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Mon, 17 Oct 2011 12:14:52 +0000
From: "iains at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug target/50678] [4.7 Regression] FAIL: c52104y on x86_64-apple-darwin10
Date: Mon, 17 Oct 2011 12:15:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: target
X-Bugzilla-Keywords:
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: iains at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P4
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 4.7.0
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Attachment #25518 is obsolete
Message-ID: <bug-50678-4-fooktnnUYX@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-50678-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-50678-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
X-SW-Source: 2011-10/txt/msg01611.txt.bz2

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50678

Iain Sandoe <iains at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
  Attachment #25518|0                           |1
        is obsolete|                            |

--- Comment #34 from Iain Sandoe <iains at gcc dot gnu.org> 2011-10-17 12:13:53 UTC ---
Created attachment 25520
  --> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=25520
revised

some bad constraints in the last version (there are some odd cases, like this
where it would be nice to be able to force r8..r15).

- now this passes everywhere (m32/m64 on D9 and D10).
... not sure how to interpret that presently (likely more asm mistakes on my
part).  

It would be easy if one could write the asm separately - but we're trying to
trick the compiler into making the unwind tables etc. ...