From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 3870 invoked by alias); 6 Feb 2013 08:45:30 -0000 Received: (qmail 2144 invoked by uid 48); 6 Feb 2013 08:44:58 -0000 From: "gingold at gcc dot gnu.org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug target/50678] [4.7/4.8 Regression] FAIL: c52104y on x86_64-apple-darwin10 Date: Wed, 06 Feb 2013 08:45:00 -0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: target X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: gingold at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW X-Bugzilla-Priority: P4 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 4.7.3 X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: CC Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org X-SW-Source: 2013-02/txt/msg00464.txt.bz2 http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50678 gingold@gcc.gnu.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |gingold at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #75 from gingold at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-02-06 08:44:51 UTC --- (In reply to comment #74) > > Tristan, any comments here? This is fine with me. As a possible minor optimization (for the future), we could avoid the version test if __MAC_OS_X_VERSION_MIN_REQUIRED is >= 1080 according to Availability.h Tristan.