From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 8717 invoked by alias); 16 Oct 2011 22:56:25 -0000 Received: (qmail 8706 invoked by uid 22791); 16 Oct 2011 22:56:25 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.9 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,AWL,BAYES_00 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from localhost (HELO gcc.gnu.org) (127.0.0.1) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Sun, 16 Oct 2011 22:56:10 +0000 From: "oleg.endo@t-online.de" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug target/50751] New: SH Target: Displacement addressing does not work for QImode and HImode Date: Sun, 16 Oct 2011 22:56:00 -0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: new X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: target X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: enhancement X-Bugzilla-Who: oleg.endo@t-online.de X-Bugzilla-Status: UNCONFIRMED X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: --- X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org X-SW-Source: 2011-10/txt/msg01560.txt.bz2 http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50751 Bug #: 50751 Summary: SH Target: Displacement addressing does not work for QImode and HImode Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: enhancement Priority: P3 Component: target AssignedTo: unassigned@gcc.gnu.org ReportedBy: oleg.endo@t-online.de CC: kkojima@gcc.gnu.org Target: sh*-*-* Displacement addressing is only used for SImode but not for QImode nor HImode. The following example summarizes the problem: struct X { char a, b, c, d; short e, f; int g, h; }; int test_func_4 (X* x) { return x->b + x->e + x->g; } compiled with: -Os -m4-single -ml -S mov r4,r1 add #1,r1 mov.b @r1,r0 add #3,r1 mov.w @r1,r1 add r1,r0 mov.l @(8,r4),r1 rts add r1,r0 would be better as: mov.b @(1,r4),r0 mov r0,r1 mov.w @(4,r4),r0 add r0,r1 mov.l @(8,r4),r0 add r1,r0 rts nop Using built-in specs. COLLECT_GCC=sh-elf-gcc COLLECT_LTO_WRAPPER=/usr/local/libexec/gcc/sh-elf/4.7.0/lto-wrapper Target: sh-elf Configured with: ../gcc-trunk/configure --target=sh-elf --prefix=/usr/local --enable-languages=c,c++ --enable-multilib --disable-libssp --disable-nls --disable-werror --enable-lto --with-newlib --with-gnu-as --with-gnu-ld --with-system-zlib Thread model: single gcc version 4.7.0 20111016 (experimental) (GCC)