public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [Bug libgcj/50844] New: SimpleDateFormat too slow @ 2011-10-24 6:11 lsching17 at gmail dot com 2011-10-24 6:11 ` [Bug libgcj/50844] " lsching17 at gmail dot com ` (2 more replies) 0 siblings, 3 replies; 4+ messages in thread From: lsching17 at gmail dot com @ 2011-10-24 6:11 UTC (permalink / raw) To: gcc-bugs http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50844 Bug #: 50844 Summary: SimpleDateFormat too slow Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.5.2 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: libgcj AssignedTo: unassigned@gcc.gnu.org ReportedBy: lsching17@gmail.com The constructor of class "java.text.SimpleDateFormat" is too slow. With the test script attached. In a core 2 duo machine+linux kernel 2.6.38+1G ram, only around 70 objects can be created per second Compare to Sun jre 6 update 6, 100000+ objects can be created per second ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* [Bug libgcj/50844] SimpleDateFormat too slow 2011-10-24 6:11 [Bug libgcj/50844] New: SimpleDateFormat too slow lsching17 at gmail dot com @ 2011-10-24 6:11 ` lsching17 at gmail dot com 2011-10-24 6:13 ` lsching17 at gmail dot com 2011-10-25 5:46 ` lsching17 at gmail dot com 2 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread From: lsching17 at gmail dot com @ 2011-10-24 6:11 UTC (permalink / raw) To: gcc-bugs http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50844 --- Comment #1 from lsching17 at gmail dot com 2011-10-24 06:11:22 UTC --- Created attachment 25585 --> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=25585 test script ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* [Bug libgcj/50844] SimpleDateFormat too slow 2011-10-24 6:11 [Bug libgcj/50844] New: SimpleDateFormat too slow lsching17 at gmail dot com 2011-10-24 6:11 ` [Bug libgcj/50844] " lsching17 at gmail dot com @ 2011-10-24 6:13 ` lsching17 at gmail dot com 2011-10-25 5:46 ` lsching17 at gmail dot com 2 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread From: lsching17 at gmail dot com @ 2011-10-24 6:13 UTC (permalink / raw) To: gcc-bugs http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50844 --- Comment #2 from lsching17 at gmail dot com 2011-10-24 06:12:59 UTC --- The last sentense should be "Compare to Sun jre 6 update 26, 100000+ objects can be created per second" ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* [Bug libgcj/50844] SimpleDateFormat too slow 2011-10-24 6:11 [Bug libgcj/50844] New: SimpleDateFormat too slow lsching17 at gmail dot com 2011-10-24 6:11 ` [Bug libgcj/50844] " lsching17 at gmail dot com 2011-10-24 6:13 ` lsching17 at gmail dot com @ 2011-10-25 5:46 ` lsching17 at gmail dot com 2 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread From: lsching17 at gmail dot com @ 2011-10-25 5:46 UTC (permalink / raw) To: gcc-bugs http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50844 --- Comment #3 from lsching17 at gmail dot com 2011-10-25 05:46:27 UTC --- Created attachment 25608 --> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=25608 result of command "gcj -v" ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2011-10-25 5:46 UTC | newest] Thread overview: 4+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed) -- links below jump to the message on this page -- 2011-10-24 6:11 [Bug libgcj/50844] New: SimpleDateFormat too slow lsching17 at gmail dot com 2011-10-24 6:11 ` [Bug libgcj/50844] " lsching17 at gmail dot com 2011-10-24 6:13 ` lsching17 at gmail dot com 2011-10-25 5:46 ` lsching17 at gmail dot com
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox; as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).