From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-391688-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: (qmail 11935 invoked by alias); 12 May 2012 12:31:59 -0000
Received: (qmail 11923 invoked by uid 22791); 12 May 2012 12:31:58 -0000
X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-4.3 required=5.0	tests=ALL_TRUSTED,AWL,BAYES_00,KHOP_THREADED
X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org
Received: from localhost (HELO gcc.gnu.org) (127.0.0.1)    by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Sat, 12 May 2012 12:31:45 +0000
From: "manu at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug tree-optimization/50847] missed warning about unreachable code after throw statment.
Date: Sat, 12 May 2012 12:36:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: tree-optimization
X-Bugzilla-Keywords:
X-Bugzilla-Severity: enhancement
X-Bugzilla-Who: manu at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: UNCONFIRMED
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: CC
Message-ID: <bug-50847-4-Pkbtod3ZNb@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-50847-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-50847-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
X-SW-Source: 2012-05/txt/msg01306.txt.bz2

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D50847

Manuel L=C3=B3pez-Ib=C3=A1=C3=B1ez <manu at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|lopezibanez at gmail dot    |manu at gcc dot gnu.org
                   |com                         |

--- Comment #4 from Manuel L=C3=B3pez-Ib=C3=A1=C3=B1ez <manu at gcc dot gnu=
.org> 2012-05-12 12:31:14 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #1)
> Manuel, could you improve gcc diagnostics in this area?

Sorry but the little free time I have for GCC is going to be focused on
improving the options machinery and the caret diagnostics. I may try to push
for colors, if I find the time.

Unfortunately, we are very very few working on C/C++ FEs right now.

In this case, I am not even sure how this could be implemented in the FE
without  some kind of control-flow graph.