From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-371845-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: (qmail 15647 invoked by alias); 25 Oct 2011 18:09:03 -0000
Received: (qmail 15636 invoked by uid 22791); 25 Oct 2011 18:09:02 -0000
X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.9 required=5.0	tests=ALL_TRUSTED,AWL,BAYES_00
X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org
Received: from localhost (HELO gcc.gnu.org) (127.0.0.1)    by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Tue, 25 Oct 2011 18:08:48 +0000
From: "daniel.kruegler at googlemail dot com" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug c++/50864] [4.6/4.7 Regression] ICE with decltype and "declval" from another namespace
Date: Tue, 25 Oct 2011 18:09:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: c++
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: ice-on-valid-code
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: daniel.kruegler at googlemail dot com
X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields:
Message-ID: <bug-50864-4-IL3yBbIAAA@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-50864-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-50864-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
X-SW-Source: 2011-10/txt/msg02589.txt.bz2

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D50864

--- Comment #8 from Daniel Kr=C3=BCgler <daniel.kruegler at googlemail dot =
com> 2011-10-25 18:08:01 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #7)
> The arrow operator (vs, eg, +) seems also essential.

That makes sense to me, because the code could never be valid, so I would
suggest that the keyword is changed to ice-on-invalid-code. The proper code

namespace impl {
  template <class T> T create();
}

template < class lhs, class rhs >
struct is_arrow_operable_impl
{
  template <class T, class U,
        class =3D decltype(impl::create<T>()->*impl::create<U>())>
  void test();
};


works as expected. I guess the reason for the ICE of the original code is t=
hat
the compiler runs into a branch where the second impl::create is interprete=
d as
a member access, which could never be valid, because there is no (base) cla=
ss
impl.=20

But this is probably only part of the whole story, because if I change the
erroneous example to

struct impl {
  template <class T> static T create();
};

template < class lhs, class rhs >
struct is_arrow_operable_impl
{
  template <class T, class U,
        class =3D decltype(impl::create<T>()->impl::create<U>())
  >
  void test();
};


I'm getting "internal compiler error: Segmentation fault" without further
context information. Note that *this* example *can* lead to valid code when
attempting to instantiate is_arrow_operable_impl with impl* and int,
respectively, for example.