From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-372007-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: (qmail 12398 invoked by alias); 27 Oct 2011 07:09:55 -0000
Received: (qmail 12379 invoked by uid 22791); 27 Oct 2011 07:09:54 -0000
X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.9 required=5.0	tests=ALL_TRUSTED,AWL,BAYES_00
X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org
Received: from localhost (HELO gcc.gnu.org) (127.0.0.1)    by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Thu, 27 Oct 2011 07:09:40 +0000
From: "kreckel at ginac dot de" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug libstdc++/50880] New: __complex_acosh() picks wrong complex branch
Date: Thu, 27 Oct 2011 07:09:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: new
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: libstdc++
X-Bugzilla-Keywords:
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: kreckel at ginac dot de
X-Bugzilla-Status: UNCONFIRMED
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields:
Message-ID: <bug-50880-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
X-SW-Source: 2011-10/txt/msg02751.txt.bz2

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50880

             Bug #: 50880
           Summary: __complex_acosh() picks wrong complex branch
    Classification: Unclassified
           Product: gcc
           Version: unknown
            Status: UNCONFIRMED
          Severity: normal
          Priority: P3
         Component: libstdc++
        AssignedTo: unassigned@gcc.gnu.org
        ReportedBy: kreckel@ginac.de


According to the C++ standard, acosh(complex<T>) should behave just like C99's
cacosh(T complex) function. There, the branch cut is "at values less than 1
along the real axis" and the "range of a half-strip of non-negative values
along the real axis and in the interval [-i*pi,+i*pi] along the imaginary
axis."

The implementation in tr1/complex gets this wrong. The result returned by
__complex_acosh() are all wrong in the lower complex plain. It can be easily
fixed. I'm attaching a patch.