From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-375797-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: (qmail 28707 invoked by alias); 5 Dec 2011 09:21:36 -0000
Received: (qmail 28692 invoked by uid 22791); 5 Dec 2011 09:21:34 -0000
X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.9 required=5.0	tests=ALL_TRUSTED,AWL,BAYES_00
X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org
Received: from localhost (HELO gcc.gnu.org) (127.0.0.1)    by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Mon, 05 Dec 2011 09:21:20 +0000
From: "ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug rtl-optimization/50904] [4.7 regression] pessimization when -fno-protect-parens is enabled by -Ofast
Date: Mon, 05 Dec 2011 09:21:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: rtl-optimization
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: missed-optimization
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: ASSIGNED
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P2
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 4.7.0
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields:
Message-ID: <bug-50904-4-hyBzNE8Ook@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-50904-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-50904-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
X-SW-Source: 2011-12/txt/msg00363.txt.bz2

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50904

--- Comment #39 from Eric Botcazou <ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org> 2011-12-05 09:21:15 UTC ---
> Thus, I think if at the RTL level we see a missed invariant motion then
> this is a RTL level bug (esp. if it only triggers with  -fno-protect-parens).

Well, how can the RTL level invent load hoisting opportunities?  They are of
course already present at the Tree level, see the .optimized dump:

vect_var_.124_350 = MEM[(real(kind=8)[9] *)&x2gauss];

vect_var_.133_823 = MEM[(real(kind=8)[9] *)&y2gauss];

vect_var_.157_586 = MEM[(real(kind=8)[9] *)&w2gauss];

vect_var_.124_357 = MEM[(real(kind=8)[9] *)&x2gauss + 16B];

vect_var_.133_363 = MEM[(real(kind=8)[9] *)&y2gauss + 16B];

vect_var_.157_874 = MEM[(real(kind=8)[9] *)&w2gauss + 16B];

vect_var_.124_405 = MEM[(real(kind=8)[9] *)&x2gauss + 32B];

vect_var_.133_594 = MEM[(real(kind=8)[9] *)&y2gauss + 32B];

vect_var_.157_610 = MEM[(real(kind=8)[9] *)&w2gauss + 32B];

vect_var_.124_651 = MEM[(real(kind=8)[9] *)&x2gauss + 48B];

vect_var_.133_680 = MEM[(real(kind=8)[9] *)&y2gauss + 48B];

vect_var_.157_805 = MEM[(real(kind=8)[9] *)&w2gauss + 48B];