From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-372449-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: (qmail 28684 invoked by alias); 31 Oct 2011 10:10:59 -0000
Received: (qmail 27713 invoked by uid 22791); 31 Oct 2011 10:07:38 -0000
X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.9 required=5.0	tests=ALL_TRUSTED,AWL,BAYES_00
X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org
Received: from localhost (HELO gcc.gnu.org) (127.0.0.1)    by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Mon, 31 Oct 2011 10:07:23 +0000
From: "jarrydb at cse dot unsw.edu.au" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug c++/50929] [C++0x] Wrong function selected for overload with template and rvalue reference
Date: Mon, 31 Oct 2011 10:10:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: c++
X-Bugzilla-Keywords:
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: jarrydb at cse dot unsw.edu.au
X-Bugzilla-Status: UNCONFIRMED
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields:
Message-ID: <bug-50929-4-llOCR4LubO@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-50929-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-50929-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
X-SW-Source: 2011-10/txt/msg03193.txt.bz2

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50929

--- Comment #4 from Jarryd Beck <jarrydb at cse dot unsw.edu.au> 2011-10-31 10:07:04 UTC ---
I didn't realise that A(A&) was a better match. I was thinking of C++ code
where you might write:

  template <typename T>
  A(const T& t);

  A(const A& rhs);

in which case A(const A&) would be chosen. I didn't realise that the rvalue
reference puts a spanner in the works. I was reading the part about a template
function and a non-template function being candidates, and if the non-template
function is no worse than the template function then it is chosen. But I didn't
realise that in this case the non-template one is actually worse.

I suppose that the bug can probably be marked as invalid then.