From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-382721-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: (qmail 29999 invoked by alias); 6 Feb 2012 21:40:33 -0000
Received: (qmail 29989 invoked by uid 22791); 6 Feb 2012 21:40:32 -0000
X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.9 required=5.0	tests=ALL_TRUSTED,AWL,BAYES_00
X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org
Received: from localhost (HELO gcc.gnu.org) (127.0.0.1)    by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Mon, 06 Feb 2012 21:40:19 +0000
From: "wschmidt at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug tree-optimization/50969] 17% degradation in 168.wupwise for interleave via permutation
Date: Mon, 06 Feb 2012 21:40:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: tree-optimization
X-Bugzilla-Keywords:
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: wschmidt at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: UNCONFIRMED
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields:
Message-ID: <bug-50969-4-HUgYTwTAvN@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-50969-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-50969-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
X-SW-Source: 2012-02/txt/msg00655.txt.bz2

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50969

--- Comment #3 from William J. Schmidt <wschmidt at gcc dot gnu.org> 2012-02-06 21:39:38 UTC ---
Author: wschmidt
Date: Mon Feb  6 21:39:34 2012
New Revision: 183944

URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=183944
Log:
2012-02-06  Bill Schmidt  <wschmidt@linux.vnet.ibm.com>

    PR tree-optimization/50969
    * tree-vect-stmts.c (vect_model_store_cost): Correct statement cost to
    use vec_perm rather than vector_stmt.
    (vect_model_load_cost): Likewise.
    * config/i386/i386.c (ix86_builtin_vectorization_cost): Change cost of
    vec_perm to be the same as other vector statements.
    * config/rs6000/rs6000.c (rs6000_builtin_vectorization_cost): Revise
    cost of vec_perm for TARGET_VSX.


Modified:
    trunk/gcc/ChangeLog
    trunk/gcc/config/i386/i386.c
    trunk/gcc/config/rs6000/rs6000.c
    trunk/gcc/tree-vect-stmts.c