public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "burnus at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org> To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug fortran/50981] [4.5/4.6 Regression] Wrong-code for scalarizing ELEMENTAL call with absent OPTIONAL argument Date: Mon, 07 May 2012 14:41:00 -0000 [thread overview] Message-ID: <bug-50981-4-MuMNbeQKzl@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/> (raw) In-Reply-To: <bug-50981-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50981 --- Comment #42 from Tobias Burnus <burnus at gcc dot gnu.org> 2012-05-07 14:34:16 UTC --- (In reply to comment #36) > I lost a bit the overview, but I think the following still needs to be done: > > - 4.4/4.5/4.6: Backporting the fix for nonpresent actuals to elemental procs, > cf. commit in comment 5 / comment 6. That is a true [4.4-4.6] regression > - 4.6: Backporting for the fix for unallocated/unassociated variables to > elemental procedures. That's not a true regression. Not yet backported. The first issue (cf. comment 0) occurred with user code. It is probably sufficient to only backport that one to only 4.6. > - The test case of comment 13 / attachment 26291 [details] Now fixed (4.7/4.8). > - The test case of comment 23 / attachment 26392 [details] > "sub_ctae" is invalid in needs to be removed. The test case compiles without > any problems, but the program segfaults at run time for: > call sub_ct(var1) > call sub_ct(var2) > if the variables aren't allocated. That seems to be the same issue as > comment 31. Namely: The present() check does not work for CLASS. Seems still to be the case. "print *, present(y)" should print false for comment 31 as "y" is an unallocated actual to an nonalloctable dummy. It shows "T". > - For the following, a test case should be written, tested, and included > in the test suite (partially covered by the tests above): Still valid, cf. comment 36
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-05-07 14:34 UTC|newest] Thread overview: 48+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top 2011-11-03 14:19 [Bug fortran/50981] New: [4.4/4.5/4.6/4.7 " burnus at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-11-03 16:39 ` [Bug fortran/50981] " mikael at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-11-03 17:12 ` burnus at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-11-03 19:20 ` mikael at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-11-05 12:14 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-11-22 19:30 ` mikael at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-01-04 14:05 ` mikael at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-01-04 14:22 ` mikael at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-01-04 14:37 ` mikael at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-01-04 15:06 ` [Bug fortran/50981] [4.4/4.5/4.6 " mikael at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-01-04 15:06 ` mikael at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-01-05 14:51 ` mikael at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-01-05 14:51 ` mikael at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-01-06 11:07 ` burnus at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-01-10 14:21 ` burnus at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-01-10 14:29 ` burnus at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-01-10 15:16 ` mikael at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-01-10 17:31 ` mikael at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-01-10 23:56 ` burnus at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-01-11 23:32 ` mikael at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-01-16 20:17 ` burnus at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-01-18 10:45 ` burnus at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-01-18 13:29 ` mikael at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-01-20 0:49 ` mikael at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-01-20 11:37 ` burnus at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-01-20 15:53 ` mikael at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-01-20 16:25 ` dominiq at lps dot ens.fr 2012-01-21 12:30 ` dominiq at lps dot ens.fr 2012-01-25 23:27 ` mikael at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-01-25 23:27 ` burnus at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-01-26 0:37 ` mikael at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-01-26 16:42 ` dominiq at lps dot ens.fr 2012-01-28 14:00 ` dominiq at lps dot ens.fr 2012-01-29 13:56 ` dominiq at lps dot ens.fr 2012-01-29 14:00 ` burnus at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-01-29 14:08 ` dominiq at lps dot ens.fr 2012-02-02 23:14 ` mikael at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-02-03 15:06 ` burnus at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-02-12 15:47 ` mikael at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-02-21 13:36 ` burnus at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-03-04 21:05 ` mikael at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-03-04 21:50 ` mikael at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-03-13 13:22 ` [Bug fortran/50981] [4.5/4.6 " jakub at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-05-07 14:41 ` burnus at gcc dot gnu.org [this message] 2012-07-02 13:14 ` [Bug fortran/50981] [4.6 " rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-09-25 14:22 ` burnus at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-10-16 13:02 ` burnus at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-10-16 13:09 ` burnus at gcc dot gnu.org
Reply instructions: You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email using any one of the following methods: * Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client, and reply-to-all from there: mbox Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style * Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to switches of git-send-email(1): git send-email \ --in-reply-to=bug-50981-4-MuMNbeQKzl@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ \ --to=gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org \ --cc=gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org \ /path/to/YOUR_REPLY https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html * If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header via mailto: links, try the mailto: linkBe sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox; as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).