From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-381624-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: (qmail 24108 invoked by alias); 28 Jan 2012 11:41:16 -0000
Received: (qmail 24100 invoked by uid 22791); 28 Jan 2012 11:41:15 -0000
X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.9 required=5.0	tests=ALL_TRUSTED,AWL,BAYES_00
X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org
Received: from localhost (HELO gcc.gnu.org) (127.0.0.1)    by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Sat, 28 Jan 2012 11:41:03 +0000
From: "dominiq at lps dot ens.fr" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug fortran/50981] [4.4/4.5/4.6 Regression] Wrong-code for scalarizing ELEMENTAL call with absent OPTIONAL argument
Date: Sat, 28 Jan 2012 14:00:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: fortran
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: wrong-code
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: dominiq at lps dot ens.fr
X-Bugzilla-Status: ASSIGNED
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P4
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: mikael at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 4.4.7
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields:
Message-ID: <bug-50981-4-N98B3YVXet@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-50981-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-50981-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
X-SW-Source: 2012-01/txt/msg03299.txt.bz2

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50981

--- Comment #31 from Dominique d'Humieres <dominiq at lps dot ens.fr> 2012-01-28 11:40:17 UTC ---
> The test in comment #23 gives an ICE with/without the patch:
>
> pr50981_4.f90: In function 'MAIN__':
> pr50981_4.f90:16:0: internal compiler error: in fold_convert_loc, at
> fold-const.c:2016
>
> i.e., the same ICE as for pr51977 (I did not tested the patchlet in comment
> #27).

This was pr52016 fixed by revision 183625. Looking further to this test, I have
found the following reduced test which gives a segmentation fault at run time:

    type t
      integer :: a
    end type t
  type(t), allocatable :: var1, var2(:)
  call sub_cta(var2)

contains
  subroutine sub_cta(y)
    class(t), intent(inout), optional :: y(:)
! FIXME: PR 46356 ?
    print *, present(y)
    if (present(y)) y%a = 7
    if (present(y)) i = 7
  end subroutine sub_cta
end

[macbook] f90/bug% gfc pr50981_4_red_1.f90 
[macbook] f90/bug% a.out
 T

Program received signal SIGSEGV: Segmentation fault - invalid memory reference.
...

i.e., the unallocated 'var2' is viewed as present.