From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-373278-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: (qmail 27394 invoked by alias); 8 Nov 2011 13:26:04 -0000
Received: (qmail 27384 invoked by uid 22791); 8 Nov 2011 13:26:03 -0000
X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.9 required=5.0	tests=ALL_TRUSTED,AWL,BAYES_00
X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org
Received: from localhost (HELO gcc.gnu.org) (127.0.0.1)    by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Tue, 08 Nov 2011 13:25:50 +0000
From: "wouter.vermaelen at scarlet dot be" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug rtl-optimization/51014] [4.7 Regression] ICE: in apply_opt_in_copies, at loop-unroll.c:2283 with -O2 -g -funroll-loops
Date: Tue, 08 Nov 2011 13:33:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: rtl-optimization
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: ice-on-valid-code
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: wouter.vermaelen at scarlet dot be
X-Bugzilla-Status: UNCONFIRMED
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 4.7.0
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: CC
Message-ID: <bug-51014-4-BFvsAIodkD@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-51014-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-51014-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
X-SW-Source: 2011-11/txt/msg00774.txt.bz2

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51014

Wouter Vermaelen <wouter.vermaelen at scarlet dot be> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |wouter.vermaelen at scarlet
                   |                            |dot be

--- Comment #1 from Wouter Vermaelen <wouter.vermaelen at scarlet dot be> 2011-11-08 13:23:32 UTC ---
I hit the same ICE, with the same required compiler flags. Here's my reduced
testcase:

struct S {
    ~S() { delete p; }
    int* p;
};
void f(S* b, S* e) {
    for (/**/; b != e; ++b) {
        b->~S();
    }
}