public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "law at redhat dot com" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org> To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug tree-optimization/51017] [4.8/4.9/5 Regression] GCC performance regression (vs. 4.4/4.5), PRE increases register pressure too much Date: Wed, 25 Feb 2015 14:26:00 -0000 [thread overview] Message-ID: <bug-51017-4-kJlGHJu5mJ@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/> (raw) In-Reply-To: <bug-51017-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51017 Jeffrey A. Law <law at redhat dot com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Priority|P3 |P2 CC| |law at redhat dot com
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-02-25 13:54 UTC|newest] Thread overview: 31+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top 2011-11-08 0:43 [Bug middle-end/51017] New: GCC 4.6 performance regression (vs. 4.4/4.5) solar-gcc at openwall dot com 2011-11-08 0:57 ` [Bug middle-end/51017] " solar-gcc at openwall dot com 2011-11-08 1:05 ` solar-gcc at openwall dot com 2011-12-15 0:34 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-01-03 4:46 ` solar-gcc at openwall dot com 2012-01-04 19:39 ` solar-gcc at openwall dot com 2012-01-04 22:43 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-01-04 23:00 ` solar-gcc at openwall dot com 2015-02-09 0:12 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org 2015-02-16 0:08 ` solar-gcc at openwall dot com 2015-02-16 1:10 ` solar-gcc at openwall dot com 2015-02-16 10:51 ` [Bug tree-optimization/51017] GCC 4.6 performance regression (vs. 4.4/4.5), PRE increases register pressure rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org 2015-02-17 2:21 ` solar-gcc at openwall dot com 2015-02-17 2:56 ` solar-gcc at openwall dot com 2015-02-17 3:11 ` solar-gcc at openwall dot com 2015-02-17 9:25 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org 2015-02-17 9:27 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org 2015-02-18 0:03 ` solar-gcc at openwall dot com 2015-02-18 1:25 ` solar-gcc at openwall dot com 2015-02-18 3:20 ` solar-gcc at openwall dot com 2015-02-18 10:32 ` [Bug tree-optimization/51017] [4.8/4.9/5 Regression] GCC performance regression (vs. 4.4/4.5), PRE increases register pressure too much rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org 2015-02-18 11:09 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org 2015-02-25 14:26 ` law at redhat dot com [this message] 2015-06-23 8:14 ` [Bug tree-optimization/51017] [4.8/4.9/5/6 " rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org 2015-06-26 20:04 ` [Bug tree-optimization/51017] [4.9/5/6 " jakub at gcc dot gnu.org 2015-06-26 20:33 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org 2021-05-14 9:46 ` [Bug tree-optimization/51017] [9/10/11/12 Regression] GCC performance regression (vs. 4.4/4.5), PRE/LIM increase " jakub at gcc dot gnu.org 2021-06-01 8:05 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org 2022-05-27 9:34 ` [Bug tree-optimization/51017] [10/11/12/13 " rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org 2022-06-28 10:30 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org 2023-07-07 10:29 ` [Bug tree-optimization/51017] [11/12/13/14 " rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
Reply instructions: You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email using any one of the following methods: * Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client, and reply-to-all from there: mbox Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style * Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to switches of git-send-email(1): git send-email \ --in-reply-to=bug-51017-4-kJlGHJu5mJ@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ \ --to=gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org \ --cc=gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org \ /path/to/YOUR_REPLY https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html * If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header via mailto: links, try the mailto: linkBe sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox; as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).