From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-373343-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: (qmail 23660 invoked by alias); 8 Nov 2011 22:31:26 -0000
Received: (qmail 23646 invoked by uid 22791); 8 Nov 2011 22:31:25 -0000
X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.8 required=5.0	tests=ALL_TRUSTED,AWL,BAYES_00,TW_DD,TW_VS
X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org
Received: from localhost (HELO gcc.gnu.org) (127.0.0.1)    by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Tue, 08 Nov 2011 22:31:12 +0000
From: "pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug rtl-optimization/51041] g++ strange optimisation behaviour
Date: Tue, 08 Nov 2011 22:31:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: rtl-optimization
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: missed-optimization, ra
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Keywords Status Last reconfirmed Component Ever Confirmed
Message-ID: <bug-51041-4-hDx4i6hZSE@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-51041-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-51041-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
X-SW-Source: 2011-11/txt/msg00839.txt.bz2

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51041

Andrew Pinski <pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
           Keywords|                            |missed-optimization, ra
             Status|UNCONFIRMED                 |NEW
   Last reconfirmed|                            |2011-11-08
          Component|other                       |rtl-optimization
     Ever Confirmed|0                           |1

--- Comment #2 from Andrew Pinski <pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org> 2011-11-08 22:31:08 UTC ---
.L10:
    movsd    (%rbx,%rdx,8), %xmm0
    mulsd    0(%rbp,%rdx,8), %xmm0
    addq    $1, %rdx
    cmpq    $10000, %rdx
    addsd    %xmm0, %xmm2
    jne    .L10

vs:
.L10:
    movsd    (%rbx,%rdx,8), %xmm0
    mulsd    0(%rbp,%rdx,8), %xmm0
    addq    $1, %rdx
    cmpq    $10000, %rdx
    addsd    (%rsp), %xmm0
    movsd    %xmm0, (%rsp)
    jne    .L10

With -fno-exceptions I get the RA to act better again.