From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 30190 invoked by alias); 7 Dec 2011 19:08:59 -0000 Received: (qmail 30178 invoked by uid 22791); 7 Dec 2011 19:08:59 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.9 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,AWL,BAYES_00 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from localhost (HELO gcc.gnu.org) (127.0.0.1) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Wed, 07 Dec 2011 19:08:37 +0000 From: "hp at gcc dot gnu.org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug rtl-optimization/51051] [4.7 Regression]: build fails on cris-elf building libstdc++-v3 Date: Wed, 07 Dec 2011 19:08:00 -0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: rtl-optimization X-Bugzilla-Keywords: build, ice-on-valid-code X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: hp at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Status: RESOLVED X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: amodra at gmail dot com X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 4.7.0 X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org X-SW-Source: 2011-12/txt/msg00787.txt.bz2 http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51051 --- Comment #12 from Hans-Peter Nilsson 2011-12-07 19:07:27 UTC --- (In reply to comment #11) > I still have HP's patch in my local tree. I assume you mean Bernd's patch referenced in this PR. (I was only doing the legwork.) > Should I remove it? Or does it need > to be committed? Both are committed, see comments 8 and 9. Please look into what makes it look different in your tree. brgds, H-P