From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-374590-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: (qmail 21285 invoked by alias); 21 Nov 2011 02:54:54 -0000
Received: (qmail 21276 invoked by uid 22791); 21 Nov 2011 02:54:53 -0000
X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.9 required=5.0	tests=ALL_TRUSTED,AWL,BAYES_00
X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org
Received: from localhost (HELO gcc.gnu.org) (127.0.0.1)    by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Mon, 21 Nov 2011 02:54:41 +0000
From: "gary at intrepid dot com" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug bootstrap/51072] Build with --disable-bootstrap fails in libitm
Date: Mon, 21 Nov 2011 04:08:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: bootstrap
X-Bugzilla-Keywords:
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: gary at intrepid dot com
X-Bugzilla-Status: UNCONFIRMED
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields:
Message-ID: <bug-51072-4-LUYBHN25ZY@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-51072-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-51072-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
X-SW-Source: 2011-11/txt/msg02086.txt.bz2

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51072

--- Comment #7 from Gary Funck <gary at intrepid dot com> 2011-11-21 02:53:42 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #6)
> On Thu, 10 Nov 2011, rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org wrote:
> 
> > Shouldn't libitm be built with the "stage1" g++ as it is a target library,
> > even with --disable-bootstrap?
> 
> Yes, as I said in 
> <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2011-11/msg01382.html> building it with 
> a pre-installed compiler is wrong.

Isn't it also an error to build libitm unless: (1) --enable-languages=c++ is
asserted, or (2) --enable-libitm is asserted?  For (2) arguably it should imply
that c++ will be built, or disallowed.

We're seeing two failure modes noted in comment #1 and comment #2 for systems
with not-so-modern versions of g++ installed.