From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 19134 invoked by alias); 8 Jul 2012 10:25:13 -0000 Received: (qmail 19114 invoked by uid 22791); 8 Jul 2012 10:25:11 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-4.3 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,AWL,BAYES_00,KHOP_THREADED X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from localhost (HELO gcc.gnu.org) (127.0.0.1) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Sun, 08 Jul 2012 10:24:58 +0000 From: "iains at gcc dot gnu.org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug bootstrap/51094] [4.7 Regression] Bootstrap failure at revision 181279 on non-ELF targets Date: Sun, 08 Jul 2012 10:25:00 -0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: bootstrap X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: iains at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Status: RESOLVED X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 4.7.0 X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org X-SW-Source: 2012-07/txt/msg00689.txt.bz2 http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51094 --- Comment #24 from Iain Sandoe 2012-07-08 10:24:45 UTC --- (In reply to comment #23) > Iain, ro: Do you know of some darwin or solaris i386 machine where I can test > some changes to this patch? > > Does the bug mentioned in comment #15 and comment #16 needs special configure > flags? Maybe I can reproduce it on x86 somehow? (how to build 64-bit multilib > on 32 bit host?) If you want a patch testing - then I'm sure that Dominique, me or Jack can test on Darwin. Unfortunately, I am not in a position to give remote access to my Darwin boxen.